image
image

|


Go Back   macosx.com > Mac Help Forums > Mac OS X Server

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old July 23rd, 2008, 01:37 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 11
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
cticompserv is on a distinguished road
Software Update Server and Non-Apple Software

I have our Xserve's Software Update Server and Apple Remote Desktop configured to install updates on the Macs on our network. Is it possible to use the update server for non-Apple software like Firefox or for Adobe apps?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old July 23rd, 2008, 10:00 PM
ElDiabloConCaca's Avatar
U.S.D.A. Prime
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 9,731
Thanks: 2
Thanked 36 Times in 34 Posts
ElDiabloConCaca will become famous soon enough
Nope.

Each of the different pieces of software you mentioned (Firefox, Adobe Suite, etc.) uses a different mechanism from each other for detecting and downloading updates, which is also a completely different mechanism than what Apple uses to download and install Apple software updates.

You can still use Remote Desktop to install non-Apple software, but you can't use Apple's Software Update Server services to download updates for non-Apple software.
__________________
Power Macintosh G4/500MHz "Yikes!" 10.4.11 Server • 1024MB • 3 x 120GB + 320GB • DVR-111D • 2 x Radeon 7000 PCI • 2 x 17" CRT
MacBook 2.0GHz Core 2 Duo - White 10.5.4 • 2048MB • 80GB • CD-RW/DVD-ROM
iPod Photo 60GB • iPod nano 1GB • AT&T DSL 6Mb/768k
http://www.jeffhoppe.com
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old July 24th, 2008, 01:33 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 11
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
cticompserv is on a distinguished road
If only third party apps and updates were packaged in a standard way and could be installed with apt-get.

Kent
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old July 24th, 2008, 02:05 PM
nixgeek's Avatar
Mac of the SubGenius! :-)
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 7,414
Thanks: 12
Thanked 81 Times in 65 Posts
nixgeek will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by cticompserv View Post
If only third party apps and updates were packaged in a standard way and could be installed with apt-get.

Kent
Well, there's Fink in the event you want to install Unix apps in a Debian-style manner. Fink acts like the APT system in Debian.

There's also MacPorts which is a FreeBSD-like ports packaging system for Darwin/Mac OS X.
__________________
Apple iMac G5 17" (2 GHz G5) - Mac OS X 10.4.11
Apple Macintosh Quadra 650 (33 MHz MC68040) - Mac OS 8.1
Apple PowerBook Duo 230 (33 MHz MC68030) - System 7.1
"JHVH-1" (2 GHz AMD Athlon XP 2400+) - Slackware 12.1
"Kidbuntu" (2.8 GHz Celeron D 335) - Ubuntu 8.04
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old July 24th, 2008, 02:21 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 11
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
cticompserv is on a distinguished road
Oh, I know about MacPorts and Fink but I was speaking in the OS X context. If third-party developers would package their apps in the same way that Apple does then they could be slipped into the Update Server by the admin and installed the same way.

Kent
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old July 24th, 2008, 03:14 PM
ElDiabloConCaca's Avatar
U.S.D.A. Prime
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 9,731
Thanks: 2
Thanked 36 Times in 34 Posts
ElDiabloConCaca will become famous soon enough
Oooh, I don't think Apple would like that one bit. Without complete control over what code gets pushed out through their update servers, people would begin pointing the finger at Apple when Software Update borked their FireFox installation or something because the folks at Mozilla made a mistake or something...

In addition, that would put the burden of security-checking ALL code on the Software Update servers on Apple, to ensure that some rogue, disgruntled employee at some 3rd-party software company didn't get all pissed off and push a trojan out through Apple's Software Update servers.

Just my $0.02, but I don't like the idea one bit. It sounds super magnificent and awesome, but is a GREAT security concern for both Apple and me.
__________________
Power Macintosh G4/500MHz "Yikes!" 10.4.11 Server • 1024MB • 3 x 120GB + 320GB • DVR-111D • 2 x Radeon 7000 PCI • 2 x 17" CRT
MacBook 2.0GHz Core 2 Duo - White 10.5.4 • 2048MB • 80GB • CD-RW/DVD-ROM
iPod Photo 60GB • iPod nano 1GB • AT&T DSL 6Mb/768k
http://www.jeffhoppe.com
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old July 24th, 2008, 04:54 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 11
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
cticompserv is on a distinguished road
No, I'm referring to my company's xserve update server, not Apple's. I know Apple wouldn't do such a thing.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:43 PM.


Mac Support® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright 2000-2008 DigitalCrowd, Inc.