image
image

Go Back   macosx.com > Mac Help Forums > Mac OS X System & Mac Software

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
Old June 26th, 2002, 02:07 AM
Just me :)
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Posts: 34
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Zaphod_B is on a distinguished road
Question [Jaguar] Performance gain? How big?

A question for the Jaguar BETA testers in this forum:

What will my performance gain be? Approximately, in percentages? 10%? 50%? Make me happy

I currently run OS X 10.1.5, on a G4 700 MHz LCD iMac, and it runs ok. Not too fast, but ok. When I have a lot of apps open it will slow down severely and sometimes it takes 10 seconds just to open a Finder window... not so nice.

BTW: I don't do video-editing or photoshop. I just browse, read email, use MSN/ICQ and sometimes OfficeX. Just a regular home user.

Anyone? I don't want to start a full discussion here on Jaguar, there are enough other topics about it. But just a speed comparison between 10.1.5 and 10.2 (10.5??) would be nice!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old June 26th, 2002, 02:34 AM
azosx's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 330
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
azosx is on a distinguished road
Quote:
When I have a lot of apps open it will slow down severely and sometimes it takes 10 seconds just to open a Finder window... not so nice.
You could probably do for some more memory. What do you have now, 256MB? I've found that atleast 512MB runs OS X fairly smooth. I also have 1MB of L3 cache so that can make a big difference as well.

As for your performance gains, it's hard to say. Since the slowdowns you are experiencing is likely due to not enough memory, you probably can still expect the slowdowns to happen in Jaguar when you have a lot of apps open.

You will find that Jaguar boots 30-40% faster than 10.1. The GUI also is a lot snappier and the visual enhancements are very nice.

I got to play with the 10.2 6C48 this weekend, released in May I think. It still has a long ways to go but there have been atleast two releases since then so the build I got to use was slightly older.

I think Jaguar will be a pleasent surprise for everyone when it's released. You can count on an overall more responsive system. You'll get back that feeling you missed when first giving up OS 9 for X if that makes any sense.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old June 26th, 2002, 05:14 AM
Just me :)
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Posts: 34
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Zaphod_B is on a distinguished road
memory

I have 384 MB of RAM which should be enough for just some mailreading, browsing and IM'ing? Shouldn't it?

I'm thinking about replacing the added 128 MB (which I happened to have lying around) with a 512 MB module though. Makes 750
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
disabling the kext extensions for performance? chrstphr Mac OS X System & Mac Software 1 February 26th, 2003 06:58 PM
9 Vs X performance compared.Does MacOs X take advantage of your system? Samuel Apple News, Rumors & Discussion 17 September 7th, 2002 10:43 PM
What's the big deal about Quartz? BusinezGuy Hardware & Peripherals 1 August 9th, 2002 10:14 PM
Can Apple ever make up for the big mistake? fryke Apple News, Rumors & Discussion 71 April 24th, 2002 07:28 AM
Ehh....how big is XFree86 - source distribution? J.M.J. Mac OS X System & Mac Software 3 August 15th, 2001 12:57 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1
Copyright 2000-2010 DigitalCrowd, Inc.