image
image

Go Back   macosx.com > Mac Help Forums > Mac OS X System & Mac Software

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old October 30th, 2002, 03:32 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
OdinsDream is on a distinguished road
Transfer from 9.1 >> OSX, can't run binary file

I've been given the task of transferring some files from a machine running 9.1 to a replacement machine running 10.2.

Some of the files, particularly Quark XPress files, and Installer package files, were transferred fine, but now they have no application association with them.

For instance, double-clicking on the installer binary for "suitcase fonts" gives me the message about there being no apporpriate application to open this file. It's an executable binary file, though... which I successfully ran on the 9.1 machine. The file specifically mentions being OSX compatible during it's installation routine, but I just can't get it to run on this OSX system.

Also, the Quark files, when double-clicked, are no longer associated with Quark. However, if I use Quark's File_Open command, I can easily select the file, and properly open it. Can I reassociate these files?



I'm thinking the reasons for this could be in the transfer method. I have no firewire cables, and the zip drive option is out, since I've had to move over a gig's worth of files. The 9.1 machine has no cd burner.

I run linux myself, and I have an FTP server. So, I connected to it with the 9.1 machine, transferred everything to the FTP server, and then connected with OSX to the same server, and grabbed the stuff again.

I'm guessing that something was lost during the transfer that indicates what type of files these are, and what should be done to run them.

Does anyone have a solution to modify the already-tranferred files so that I can reassociate them properly?

Of particular importance is the installer I mentioned, which is just a self-installing executable.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old October 30th, 2002, 03:57 PM
scruffy's Avatar
Notorious Olive Counter
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Soviet Canuckistan
Posts: 1,726
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
scruffy is on a distinguished road
The stuff that was lost would be the resource forks of the files. Linux (and every other OS in the world) doesn't know about resource forks. If you still have the 9.1 machine handy, you could archive the files to a format that uses no resource forks - using an app like Stuffit for example - transfer the archive, and expand it on OS X.

If you're lucky, all that was in there was the type/creator codes. To restore that, just select the file in the Finder, choose get info, and pick the application you want to open the file with. Somewhat tedious, but it works alright.

The executable, since it runs on OS X and 9, is presumable a Carbon app. They typically keep a fair amount of vital information in their resource forks. I'm afraid I can't think of any way to restore that file to its original state.
__________________

What is the robbing of a bank compared to the founding of a bank?
-- Bertold Brecht
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old October 30th, 2002, 10:41 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
OdinsDream is on a distinguished road
Thanks for the tips!!

I'll definitely try this solution, as I actually do have the machine for a little longer.

The executable should still be runnable in OS X, though?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old October 31st, 2002, 04:03 AM
profx's Avatar
ill never 4get watsisname
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Auckland New Zealand
Posts: 386
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
profx is on a distinguished road
yeah, under classic most likley, but it should run. There are very few apps that wont run in classic. Just make sure you get the resource forks of all your files. Using stuffit is a good way to do this. The resource fork is where previews, creator codes, modifcation dates etc are held in normal files and where the GUI part of classic applications are kept.

You will notice if you control click on an OSX application and go to show package contents, all of the resource files are now kept there as binary files. Apple is slowly but surely moving away from having a data and a resource fork.
__________________
| PowerBook G4 550 - 10.4 - 512Mb - 20Gb | 30Gb iPod Photo | 40x12x48 Fantom Drives CDRW (firewire) | Logitech Cordless Mouse MX700 | xBox with XBMC for movies and music in the lounge
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
I installed Fink under root and..... Hydroglow Unix & X11 5 November 27th, 2002 04:57 PM
osx -> winxp file transfer fbp_ Mac OS X System & Mac Software 3 July 8th, 2002 01:08 PM
very slow file transfer from OSX to win2000 firewall Mac OS X System & Mac Software 20 May 7th, 2002 01:22 PM
File transfer on osx? macfreak88 Mac OS X System & Mac Software 6 April 24th, 2002 01:00 AM
vignette client on mac os x erim Software Programming & Web Scripting 8 July 13th, 2001 02:14 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:36 AM.


Mac Support® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright 2000-2008 DigitalCrowd, Inc.