image
image

Go Back   macosx.com > Mac Help Forums > Mac OS X System & Mac Software

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old April 23rd, 2006, 02:44 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Groton, CT, USA
Posts: 1,291
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
chemistry_geek is on a distinguished road
Why are Mac OS X for Intel updates larger than the corresponding PowerPC updates?

I've noticed that the Mac OS X updates for Intel are larger than the corresponding updates for PowerPC. Does any one know the reason(s) for this?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old April 23rd, 2006, 07:18 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,339
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
barhar is on a distinguished road
A 'Universal' application contains code for both Intel 'and' a PowerPC based Macs.

If you are of 'System 9.x' and earlier - 'PowerPC' (only) vs. 'Universal' applications is the modern day equivalent of the '68000' (only) code applications vs. the 'Fat Binary' (68000 and PowerPC) code applications, of years past (1997). Over time, the applications were 'PowerPC' only, and the '68000' and 'Fat Binary' applications died out. The same will happen to 'PowerPC' (only) and 'Universal' applications - when more and more 'Intel based Mac' only applications are created.

See ('barhar' and others) posts below for possible explanation as to the Intel update and combo update being larger than their PowerPC counterparts.

Last edited by barhar; April 24th, 2006 at 01:48 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old April 23rd, 2006, 10:17 PM
ElDiabloConCaca's Avatar
U.S.D.A. Prime
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 10,283
Thanks: 3
Thanked 109 Times in 101 Posts
ElDiabloConCaca is a jewel in the roughElDiabloConCaca is a jewel in the roughElDiabloConCaca is a jewel in the rough
Does that mean that Apple's 10.4.6 Combo Updater for Intel is actually a Universal Binary that will update a PowerPC as well?

http://www.apple.com/downloads/macos...oforintel.html

If so, why have a separate updater for PowerPC-only machines?

http://www.apple.com/downloads/macos...mboforppc.html
__________________
Power Macintosh G4/500MHz "Yikes!" 10.4.11 Server • 1024MB • 3 x 120GB + 320GB • DVR-111D • 2 x Radeon 7000 PCI • 2 x 17" CRT
MacBook 2.0GHz Core 2 Duo - White 10.5.5 • 2048MB • 80GB • CD-RW/DVD-ROM
iPod Photo 60GB • iPod nano 1GB • AT&T DSL 6Mb/768k
http://www.jeffhoppe.com
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old April 23rd, 2006, 11:06 PM
jbarley's Avatar
One more, for the road!
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: An Island called Vancouver
Posts: 369
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
jbarley will become famous soon enough
Gotcha!
__________________
ROFL: (Rolling on the floor laughing.) Typically used by people who are too lazy to press the rest of the keys on their keyboard needed to communicate in English.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old April 23rd, 2006, 11:16 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,339
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
barhar is on a distinguished road
'Does that mean that Apple's 10.4.6 Combo Updater for Intel is actually a Universal Binary that will update a PowerPC as well?' - no. 'Mac OS X 10.4.6 Combo for Intel' is strictly for Intel based Macs. 'Mac OS X 10.4.6 Combo for PPC' is strictly for PowerPC based Mac's.

Believe it or not - I read the post and went down a path I should not have.

Thus for clarity, and actually answering the original post of 'Why are Mac OS X for Intel updates larger', - when code is compiled for different microprocessors - the resultant code size will vary.
Thus, assuming that only the same exact fixes were compiled for both processors - the resultant upgrades would most likely be of different sizes.

Also, the MacOS X update(s) for the Intel based Macs may include additional code, for whatever reason, by Apple. This is quite likely considering - that most of the code written for the PowerPC based Macs is quite mature, and any updates would be just that - updates. But, Apple is still fixing MacOS X to run on the Intel based Macs; thus, It is quite possible that additional fixes (tweaks) are also being included [in addition to the code being added to the PowerPC version of the update(s)] in the Intel update releases.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old April 24th, 2006, 04:01 AM
Lt Major Burns's Avatar
"Dicky" Charlteston-Burns
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Manchester
Posts: 3,329
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Lt Major Burns will become famous soon enough
as well as all the updated inherent anti-piracy updates. people who still want to get mac os running on pcs won't like updates.
__________________
Dual 1.8GHz G5 2GB, 1TB, Radeon 9600XT 128MB, 10.5
20" Apple Cinema Display + Dell 2005FPW 20" dual-head
iBook G3 700MHz
640MB, 40GB, Rage128 16MB, 10.4, dying battery
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Updates spirit Mac OS X System & Mac Software 1 September 13th, 2005 12:59 PM
G5 updates...When? garymum4d Apple News, Rumors & Discussion 15 May 12th, 2004 08:47 AM
os updates alexandr Mac OS X System & Mac Software 3 March 27th, 2004 11:37 AM
Updates Since 10.3? tk4two1 Mac OS X System & Mac Software 2 December 31st, 2003 11:11 PM
Updates updates and more update rumours scott Apple News, Rumors & Discussion 0 June 4th, 2001 06:44 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:17 AM.


Mac Support® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright 2000-2008 DigitalCrowd, Inc.