|
#1
| ||||
| ||||
| Why isn't Leopard utilizing all cores? While decompressing a file, I noticed that my system was only using 100% of one of the cores instead of 100% of all four cores. Why wouldn't it use all four and get the job done that much quicker? ![]()
__________________ 2.66GHz Mac Pro Quad Xeon 2.2GHz Santa Rosa MacBook Pro 2.0GHz iMac Core Duo 8GB iPhone |
|
#2
| ||||
| ||||
| Because the program, bunzip2 in this case, is not multithreaded. If the program only has a single thread it cannot be automatically parallelized and run on separate cores. Now if you have lots of things to decompress you could start 4 instances to use all four cores.
__________________ Wenn ist das Nunstruck git und Slotermeyer? Ja!... Beiherhund das Oder die Flipperwaldt gersput! |
|
#3
| ||||
| ||||
| Thank you for the explanation lurk, it seems so obvious now. ![]()
__________________ 2.66GHz Mac Pro Quad Xeon 2.2GHz Santa Rosa MacBook Pro 2.0GHz iMac Core Duo 8GB iPhone |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|