image
image

Go Back   macosx.com > Mac Help Forums > Mac OS X System & Mac Software

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
Old November 4th, 2009, 11:06 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Begium
Posts: 389
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
anerki is on a distinguished road
Tweaking iTunes

Hi,

I recently installed the new OS X on my MacBook 13" (the 2Ghz Dual Core white one) hoping it would increase the performance of the system, and specifically iTunes.

(MacBook: http://apple-history.com/?page=gallery&model=mb_late_07)

My iTunes library, like many out there, is large, but not overly large and definitely not to the point where it should be a problem. It's now at (I would guess) about 30 or so gigs, filled with mostly large MP3 files (70-200Mb).

- It's gotten to the point where I wait 3-4 seconds to go to the 'next' song when I press the 'right' arrow. This is (obviously) unacceptably slow. I thought about upgrading the RAM of the machine since it only has 1Gb I think. Now can anyone guarantee that doubling the RAM will properly increase performance again up to the point where I don't want to throw the machine out of the window? Yes, of course it will increase performance, that's obvious. But will it be enough, if not, I'll wait until it's completely unworkable and buy one of those new babyproof MacBooks (Edit: Or 4Gb?)

- The library is on an external 1Tb USB2 drive, but I could easily move it to the MacBook's HD but that's slower than the USB2 drive. Would this help any bit?

- Would removing all CD covers and images I have in there significantly increase performance?

Thanks
Frederik-Jan.

Last edited by anerki; November 4th, 2009 at 11:13 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old November 4th, 2009, 11:45 AM
ElDiabloConCaca's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 12,678
Thanks: 7
Thanked 388 Times in 370 Posts
ElDiabloConCaca is a glorious beacon of lightElDiabloConCaca is a glorious beacon of lightElDiabloConCaca is a glorious beacon of lightElDiabloConCaca is a glorious beacon of lightElDiabloConCaca is a glorious beacon of lightElDiabloConCaca is a glorious beacon of light
I think more RAM would provide the biggest boost to your everyday computing tasks, including the responsiveness of iTunes (since iTunes does some fancy RAM caching for songs).

Your 1TB USB 2.0 drive may be fast, but USB itself is a processor hog and resource-hungry. While your internal drive may have a slower spindle speed, I think you would see much better transfer rates on your internal drive than your external, since it's natively connected to a SATA interface (and hence no USB-to-SATA translation). Still, I think exploring the RAM dilemma would be the first thing you should do.

Is your 1TB USB 2.0 drive a Western Digital Elements drive? The reason I ask is that those drives have automatic power-saving features, like a drive spin-down that occurs during periods of inactivity. These on-drive power-saving features are independent of Mac OS X's power-saving features, and cannot be controlled via the Mac OS X "Energy Saver" preference pane (meaning you cannot turn off the drive's spin-down function, no matter how hard you try). The delay in switching songs could be due to the system waiting for your external drive to spin back up... do you notice anything like this when using iTunes?
__________________
Mac mini 2.0GHz 10.6.2 • 4GB • 320GB • Superdrive • 4 x 1TB USB 2.0 • LED Cinema Display
MacBook 2.0GHz Core 2 Duo - White 10.6.2 • 4GB • 250GB • CD-RW/DVD-ROM
iPhone 3G 8GB • iPod Touch 8GB • iPod Photo 60GB • iPod nano 1GB • AT&T U-Verse 18Mb/2Mb
http://www.jeffhoppe.com
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ElDiabloConCaca For This Useful Post:
anerki (November 5th, 2009)
  #3  
Old November 4th, 2009, 11:46 AM
earthsaver's Avatar
Ben R.
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Falls Village, Connecticut, USA
Posts: 153
Thanks: 0
Thanked 15 Times in 15 Posts
earthsaver is on a distinguished road
You've got a fine model and a memory upgrade is a sure-fire way to increase performance as you describe. You can upgrade to 4GB for about $100 (including shipping to Belgium).

Last edited by earthsaver; November 5th, 2009 at 10:02 AM. Reason: wrong URL used in reference
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old November 4th, 2009, 04:16 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Begium
Posts: 389
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
anerki is on a distinguished road
The drive is one of those WD Elements drive though it's not the spinning down that's the problem. It's not the typical unresponsiveness you get from a HD starting back up I'm afraid

Since iTunes can be such a RAM hog as you describe (and it feels) I'll probably go fetch me some fancy new RAM then, see if there's better performance RAM available that the MacBook can still make use from.

I can fit 6Gb (2+4) in there, right? Of those PC-6400 DDR2 modules? They're faster too (800Mhz instead of the 2 512 667Mhz I have now)
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old November 4th, 2009, 04:28 PM
earthsaver's Avatar
Ben R.
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Falls Village, Connecticut, USA
Posts: 153
Thanks: 0
Thanked 15 Times in 15 Posts
earthsaver is on a distinguished road
Sure, if you want to spend an extra $100, you can throw in 6GB instead of 4.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old November 5th, 2009, 03:28 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Begium
Posts: 389
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
anerki is on a distinguished road
Excellent, might as well do it properly ... Cheers!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old November 5th, 2009, 08:50 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Begium
Posts: 389
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
anerki is on a distinguished road
One last question, referring to this article : http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1651

I was thinking of buying PC2-6400 2Gb 800Mhz modules for the MacBook, though my model is older than the 2009 model, which is the only one that accepts 800Mhz modules.

However, I distinctly remember looking at the system specs on my MacBook yesterday that the slots for RAM were 800Mhz.

-I can just fit those in, right? I don't need to get the PC2-5300 DDR2 667MHz Type?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old November 5th, 2009, 08:57 AM
earthsaver's Avatar
Ben R.
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Falls Village, Connecticut, USA
Posts: 153
Thanks: 0
Thanked 15 Times in 15 Posts
earthsaver is on a distinguished road
Yep. Via the link to OWC above, you can clearly tell that it supports both types.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1
Copyright 2000-2010 DigitalCrowd, Inc.