image
image

Go Back   macosx.com > Mac Help Forums > Mac OS X System & Mac Software

View Poll Results: Should Apple introduce skins to OSX?
Simple Color Scheme 2 28.57%
Full blown widget customization 3 42.86%
No, aqua rules as is 2 28.57%
Voters: 7. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old June 3rd, 2001, 08:51 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Somewhere in the third dimension
Posts: 6
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Banchee is on a distinguished road
Question Skins

While Apple excells is some areas, they seem to leave certain stuff out. One of their biggest downfalls is customization.
Veterans of UNIX/LiNUX systems know that the two major X-based window managers, GNOME and KDE, both support custom skins. Apple has fashionably left this widely held feature out of X. If you ask me, I think skins will be one of the most powerful additions to OSX.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old June 3rd, 2001, 09:29 PM
RacerX's Avatar
Old Rhapsody User
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: US version of Siberia
Posts: 2,571
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
RacerX will become famous soon enoughRacerX will become famous soon enough
As a long time Unix/Linux user...

I know that there has been a large price for all the customization. Lets not forget that gnome and kde are built on top of the very shake structure of x-windows. Lets also not forget that most of the "cool" features of x-windows are actually violations of the x-windows standard and have introduced many problem that would not have been there had developer just followed the guide lines (best violator ever was gtk+, for both the good and bad reasons).

That aside, the main problem that people are having creating skins/themes comes from the fact that there are a number of interface properties running at the same time (namely one for carbon apps and one for cocoa apps) which makes it a tricky hack right from the start. And then there is Arent Fox (see http://www.arentfox.com ), the theme killers of Apple Legal. They didn't have much of a leg to stand on in OS 8 and 9 because Apple used the appearance functions from Copland, but now Apple has said that the look of the interface is set in stone as far as they are concerned. And they have happily sent Arent Fox after anyone who tries to make public any theme changes in OS X or any theme that looks like Aqua for any other OS (even classic Mac).

But other than that, no one is stopping you from trying.

Viva la Themes!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old June 25th, 2001, 09:12 PM
Jasoco's Avatar
Video Gamer/Collector
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Doylestown PA
Posts: 499
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Jasoco is on a distinguished road
Lightbulb Feedback time

All WE have to do is run over to Apple's Feedback page and BEG for theme support... It must be FULL Theme support.. With the power to do ANYTHING to the interface.

I don't want to have to wait for Kaleidoscope.. And frankly, I'd rather not PAY for a feature that should be part of the OS as it is.. I mean, Windows XP can do it, MS got the idea.. Apple is stupid for leaving it out.. (Sorry, Apple.. I didn't mean to call you stupid.. I'm just angry is all.)

I never used themes before as it is, I wouldn't find one as good, but with OS X we have an OS capable of doing a LOT more than before.. Think of what the theme makers could do with this power!

Transparent File areas in folders. (!) That'd be a neat idea!
I'd LOVE to see what designers could come up with!

We had better hurry over there.. If they release 10.1 at MWNY, I'll want themes. I'd hate to wait till 10.2.. Whenever THAT'd be!
__________________
Confucious Say: Jasoco, change your gosh darn SIGNATURE! it's been like that forever!
Never disobey Confucious.

Jasoco.net - GeekPub Forums
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old June 25th, 2001, 10:00 PM
AdmiralAK's Avatar
Simply Daemonic
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Classified
Posts: 5,787
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
AdmiralAK is on a distinguished road
As I have mentioned time and time again apple has a reason behind this. The aqua look is not synonymous with MacOS yet like the platinum appearance is. Apple wants name recognition that is why it is "banning" themes until such a recognition occurs. Most people outside the mac community dont know what aqua looks like, but they probably know that platinum is an Apple OS.

I am all for themes, and I dont like apple's stance on this but I believe that this is the logic behind apple's decision.
__________________
<<------------------------------>>
Seid ihr bereit fuer Club Admiralty ????
Club Admiralty: Http://www.club-admiralty.com
Copyright 1996-present
Bonified Gadget Geek :-)
<<------------------------------>>
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old June 27th, 2001, 08:24 PM
strobe's Avatar
Puny Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 795
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
strobe is on a distinguished road
I it were possible to port the NeuTech theme to OS X I'd be happy. It's possible to port it to Carbon apps, but not Cocoa. Cocoa ignores the theme layouts.
__________________
---
>80 column hard wrapped e-mail is not a sign of intelligent
>life
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old June 29th, 2001, 03:16 PM
rinse's Avatar
www.visualrinse.com
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Chicago
Posts: 777
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
rinse is on a distinguished road
i would like a nice dark theme a'la NEXT...

i use the next theme in OS9 exclusively, and have for the last year or two.... there is something i find really pro / clean about a simple black interface.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old June 29th, 2001, 09:09 PM
Xaemyl's Avatar
«Mekratrÿg» OºX
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Xül
Posts: 16
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Xaemyl is on a distinguished road
Angry

Actually, I do most of My stuff from Darwin/XFree86. When I need access to Mac apps/music stuff, then I switch to Mac OS X. This is mainly due to the fact that I despise Aqua.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old June 29th, 2001, 09:14 PM
Xaemyl's Avatar
«Mekratrÿg» OºX
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Xül
Posts: 16
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Xaemyl is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally posted by AdmiralAK
As I have mentioned time and time again apple has a reason behind this. The aqua look is not synonymous with MacOS yet like the platinum appearance is. Apple wants name recognition that is why it is "banning" themes until such a recognition occurs. Most people outside the mac community dont know what aqua looks like, but they probably know that platinum is an Apple OS.

I am all for themes, and I dont like apple's stance on this but I believe that this is the logic behind apple's decision.
I sincerely hope you're correct, AK. I suppose I can make my own BlueSteel theme for Mac OS X by hand ... but I'm too lazy. I guess I cant complain if I'm too lazy.

Well, I will be lazy no more! I am suddenly inspired! I shall create a BlueSteel theme for Mac OS X (by editing the proper resources by hand) heheh
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tired of Aqua? OSX Skins... pezagent Mac OS X System & Mac Software 6 August 13th, 2002 01:41 AM
iTunes skins??? twister Apple News, Rumors & Discussion 12 July 16th, 2002 07:50 PM
Skins or Program BBenve Software Programming & Web Scripting 8 April 1st, 2002 03:05 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:25 AM.


Mac Support® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright 2000-2008 DigitalCrowd, Inc.