|
#1
October 27th, 2007, 07:17 PM
| |||
| |||
| Leopard's wireless unstable? Does anyone else find wireless internet unstable when using leopard? Sorry guys-i'm going to get hated for this but leopard sucks right now I have found 3 issues with it that I know to be a programming issue. It will get better, but in time.
__________________ 3G iPhone on Rogers network 20" iMac 2.0GHz Intel Core Duo w/1.5GB of ram - Snow Leopard 15" Macbook Pro 2.8GHz Intel Core 2 Duo w/4GB of ram - Snow Leopard - In a world without walls and fences, who needs Windows and Gates?  |
|
#2
October 27th, 2007, 08:18 PM
| ||||
| ||||
| Couldn't say. First it didn't work at all (there's been an update for it already!), now it just works perfectly.
__________________ iMac 27" 3.06 GHz, 8 GB RAM, 1 TB HD. Mac OS X 10.6.4 MacBook Air 13" 1.6 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 80 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.6.4 iPad WiFi+3G 64 GB. iPhone 4 32 GB black. Mac user since 1987, Apple Sales Professional 2009-2010, Apple Product Professional 2007-2010, Apple Certified Support Professional 10.5 & 10.6, Apple Certified Pro Aperture 2 (Level 1) |
|
#3
October 27th, 2007, 09:37 PM
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
I have not had any problems with wireless internet.
__________________ MacBook 2.1 GHz , 250 GB, 2 GB, OS 10.6.3 PowerMac G5 Dual 2.3 GHz, 2.5 TB, 1 GB, OS 10.5.8 Server PowerMac G4 Dual 1.25 GHz, 120 GB & 100 GB RAID, 1.5 GB, OS 10.5.8 Server iPod Classic Black 120 GB Favorite Bands: Anberlin, Five Iron Frenzy My Site |
|
#4
October 30th, 2007, 09:46 AM
| |||
| |||
| well-I seriously hope they come out with an update that will fix my issue soon! I can't even use it. I am very dissapointed in Apple for putting out a OS that still has obvious issues. I mean, if you have a little usuability issue, thats one thing since its a very limited market that may do that and they probably weren't part of the beta testers. However, how can you put a product where quite obvious features don't work onto the market? I can't even use Leopard.
__________________ 3G iPhone on Rogers network 20" iMac 2.0GHz Intel Core Duo w/1.5GB of ram - Snow Leopard 15" Macbook Pro 2.8GHz Intel Core 2 Duo w/4GB of ram - Snow Leopard - In a world without walls and fences, who needs Windows and Gates? |
|
#5
October 30th, 2007, 11:38 AM
| |||
| |||
| I have and have not: on my home WLAN, Leopard claims about a time out when it tried to login to the router. But at work (the same MacBook Pro) I actually get better signal, and no login problems. I have being thinking on buying Apple's Airport Extreme. How does it work with Leopard? |
|
#6
October 30th, 2007, 11:42 AM
| ||||
| ||||
| Same as it ever did?
__________________ iMac 27" 3.06 GHz, 8 GB RAM, 1 TB HD. Mac OS X 10.6.4 MacBook Air 13" 1.6 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 80 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.6.4 iPad WiFi+3G 64 GB. iPhone 4 32 GB black. Mac user since 1987, Apple Sales Professional 2009-2010, Apple Product Professional 2007-2010, Apple Certified Support Professional 10.5 & 10.6, Apple Certified Pro Aperture 2 (Level 1) |
|
#7
October 30th, 2007, 03:28 PM
| ||||
| ||||
| Wireless is the same if not better on a pure-G network.
__________________ Power to Burn. At speeds of up to 733MHz, The most powerful Mac in history burns CDs, burns DVDs, and burns Pentiums - apple website, oct 4, 1999. advertisement for the powermac g4 |
|
#8
October 31st, 2007, 06:57 AM
| |||
| |||
| I did read somewhere something about "interface robustness" not being the same in the Leopard wireless connection. However I do not know if this is the cause, nor - quite honestly - what kind of robust magic it supposedly does. Maybe woth a look, anyone heard this also..?
__________________  I'm trying to understand... |
 |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:55 AM.
