image
image

Go Back   macosx.com > Mac Help Forums > Networking & Compatibility

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
Old October 26th, 2009, 08:14 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 12
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Gandalf123 is on a distinguished road
Switching from AFP to SMB - experienced advice required please

Hi,

We have designers on Macs running mainly OSX 10.4.11 and they connect to our Windows 2003 fileserver using the AFP protocol. The Windows server is running SFM which supports the older AFP client.

After much time researching, we found that when the designers browse the fileserver using OSX Finders column view if they click on a folder with lots of files within in, the designer experiences the beachball effect whilst the Finder builds the list of contents, presumably caching as clicking off the folder then back onto it, the folder contents display immediately.
When designers are using InDesign or PhotoShop and are browsing the server to open an image file or to 'place' an image, the beach balling /lagging effect really slows them up and is affecting their productivity.

For the purposes of testing, we connected to the same server and shares etc using SMB and the problem described above does not occur at all.
However, I'm nervous. I know that if we are to switch from AFP to SMB then all users must do it at the same time as you cannot have a mixture of the users connecting with both SMB and AFP.
But would it be enough to just make sure that ALL users are using SMB and not AFP or should I consider anything else, like will connecting via SMB affect existing data on the server that was accessed and saved omn there previously using AFP ?

If anybody has some hands-on first hand experience of this, I would love to hear from you.

Thanks in advance
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old October 26th, 2009, 02:56 PM
Natobasso's Avatar
Tech-Bot 5000
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 3,270
Thanks: 1
Thanked 16 Times in 16 Posts
Natobasso is on a distinguished road
You might try CIFS instead of SMB. It's much, much faster and seems to have fewer connection issues. CIFS is the faster, newer variant of SMB/Samba.
__________________
http://thesalon.blogspot.com
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1
Copyright 2000-2010 DigitalCrowd, Inc.