|
#1
| |||
| |||
| 802.11g performance Does anyone know how 802.11g wireless networks compare speedwise to a wired network. I currently have everything connected on a 100ft ethernet cable, but want to go wireless. Will there be a performance hit? I have a fast Cable connection, and I'm mainly concerned about internet performance, as I don't move a lot of files. Thanks |
|
#2
| ||||
| ||||
| I have a G4 Desktop on a wired router and a G4 Powerbook on an Airport Base Station and the web speed is about the same for me.
__________________ |
|
#3
| ||||
| ||||
| I noticed a slight increase in speed when I have had my G4 hooked up ethernet. Wireless speed is not significantly noticeable in my opinion. |
|
#4
| ||||
| ||||
| An 802.11g wireless network has a maximum throughput of 54Mbps. That's the MAXIMUM, and you won't ever see that speed for a number of reasons -- close to that speed: yes, full 54Mbps: no. A wired network will be faster than 802.11g if it's a 100Mbps network... slower if it's a 10Mbps network. For surfing the web, wireless is just fine. I doubt your cable connection could saturate an 802.11g network, so you'd have plenty of bandwidth to spare. Transferring files, on the other hand, will probably be slower than on a wired network.
__________________ Power Macintosh G4/500MHz "Yikes!" 10.4.11 Server • 1024MB • 3 x 120GB + 320GB • DVR-111D • 2 x Radeon 7000 PCI • 2 x 17" CRT MacBook 2.0GHz Core 2 Duo - White 10.5.5 • 2048MB • 80GB • CD-RW/DVD-ROM iPod Photo 60GB • iPod nano 1GB • AT&T DSL 6Mb/768k http://www.jeffhoppe.com |
|
#5
| ||||
| ||||
| Yeah. I'd say, if you're transferring huge files all the time over your local network, stick with wired. But if you have uses that are a little bit lighter, go for Wi-Fi.
__________________ -Adam S ... PowerBook G4 (Mac OS X... the latest version, whatever it is, I've got it, dangit) and original iPod (iLove music, therefore iLove iPod) <shamelessplug>http://www.geocities.com/adambyte</shamelessplug> |