image
image

Go Back   macosx.com > Mac Help Forums > Networking & Compatibility

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old September 16th, 2004, 05:44 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 100
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
thendis is on a distinguished road
Difference between Airport & Airport Extreme?

hello again. I have today bought two airport cards. An Airport for my iBook G3 and an Airport EXTREME for my newer eMac.

I understand there is a speed difference, but how much of a difference?

All I will really be using them for is to access my broadband internet. So just need to know will the slower, regular Airport card be quick enough to handle 512k DSL internet, or will it be slower than a direct ethernet connection (or an extreme card).

Sorry if these are stupid questions, as i said in an earlier post...i'm new
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old September 16th, 2004, 05:54 AM
ora's Avatar
ora ora is offline
free electron
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: London
Posts: 1,776
Thanks: 14
Thanked 13 Times in 13 Posts
ora is on a distinguished road
As i understand it, airport is 802.11b, which is 11megabits per second. The airport extreme is 802.11g, which can handle 54megabits/s. That means the extreme is around 5 times faster. That said, both can easily handle your broadband which is half a megabit per second.
For comparison, your ethernet will probably be 100megabits/s. I don't have airport so i can't tell you how it works in reality, but i think you'll only notice the difference when you are transferring files between machines rather than accessing the net.
__________________
--MBP 15" C2D 2.33Ghz, 2GB RAM, 160GB HD, glossy, OS 10.5.5
--Homebrew PC, 2.66 C2D, 4GB RAM, nforce 680i mobo, 3xSamsung HD (500, 2x750), 19" Acer widescreen LCD
--Mini-racked Lacie 80, 250, 300 and 500GB Ext HDs. Lacie 16x DL DVD writer. Gigabit Switch. HP pro B-8350 printer.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old September 16th, 2004, 06:27 AM
Viro's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 2,494
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Viro will become famous soon enoughViro will become famous soon enough
In practice, you'll get much less than the rated 11 mbps or 54 mbps. Reason being is that the bandwidth is shared by all the machines, so if you have 2 machines connected to an 11mbps network, each machine will only get 5.5 mbps. 4 machines and you'll get 2.75 mbps, and so on. If you have mainly 54mbps machines and just one 11mbps machine, the whole network will work at 11 mbps and so all the machines will get 11mbps to share. That's why you don't mix these machines unless completely necessary.

But for broadband, that should be fine.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old September 16th, 2004, 06:47 AM
Zammy-Sam's Avatar
Desertchild
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Germany
Posts: 6,658
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Zammy-Sam is on a distinguished road
A wireless lan accesspoint (no matter if 11mbit or 54mbit or even 108mbit) works like a switch. When you have just one wireless machine, it will get the full bandwidth. However, still you will never reach the gross 11mbit or 54mbit. The reason lies, iirc, in the protocol that will give you something like 5-7mbit for your own data. The rest will be "wasted" for the protocol which is needed to assure a stable connection.
But as Viro said, 5-7mbit for the 802.11b standard are more than enough for most broadband connections.
__________________
iBook 600; 12''; 640mb; 8mb Rage; DVD-CDRW-Combo, 20GB
P4 1.6; 2x80GB Raid1 (file-server)
tiBook 1Ghz, Superdrive, 768MB, 64mb 9000, 60GB
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:43 AM.


Mac Support® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright 2000-2008 DigitalCrowd, Inc.