image
image

Go Back   macosx.com > Community > Opinions, & Open Letters

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
Old June 29th, 2002, 01:56 AM
solrac's Avatar
Quad 6 ghz G5 Tower
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: LA, CA
Posts: 840
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
solrac is on a distinguished road
OmniWeb 4.1 Final NOT A VIABLE WEB BROWSER

I am a Flash expert. I design flash applications.

Now with Flash MX released, my upcoming projects include a video / audio chatroom (using webcam / microphones), online games, online banking, and entire content management systems....

All using Flash as a front end and User Interface.

This is the future of the web. Online web applications using Flash as a front end can be a great thing if done properly, and using object oriented code, components, and reusable code, they can be RAPIDLY developed.

Sadly, OmniWeb 4.1 still is not able to pass data from flash to a web server.

Internet Explorer, Netscape 6.2, even Chimera (Navigator)... they all work fine.

I am using a flash based system where a user can sign up (in flash). Once they sign up, they are saved to a database. They can then log in to the site, and add their favorite web sites to a list.

It's a simple tool. However, in OmniWeb you cannot log in. It will never pass the data to the server. I opened a backdoor in my application for skipping the login, and OmniWeb cannot even retrieve the list of favorite sites and display them in Flash.

Explorer works fine. Netscape works fine. Chimera doesn't work well because you cannot log in because typing in a text field doesn't work in Flash in Chimera. But you can control-click and paste text into a text field. Then the log in worked fine, and it retrieved all the data.

OmniWeb is unusable with dynamic flash applications, and therefore is a waste of a web browser, and is incompatible with the future of the web.

OmniGroup must fix this!!!!

-Carlos-
__________________
-Soon 2 B mkiv Toyota Supra Twin Turbo 6 Speed --- supraforums.com-
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old June 29th, 2002, 06:07 AM
uoba's Avatar
Re: member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Merseyside, UK
Posts: 1,726
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
uoba is on a distinguished road
Even on a simpler level than this...

Omniweb doesn't support iframes!! (ithey've been around since IE3!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old June 29th, 2002, 07:33 AM
fryke's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: macosx.com
Posts: 14,075
Thanks: 13
Thanked 90 Times in 85 Posts
fryke is a jewel in the roughfryke is a jewel in the roughfryke is a jewel in the roughfryke is a jewel in the rough
Smile

Is this the whiner's thread? Okay... OmniWeb will fix your griefs with version 5.0. It's going to take a while, but it's going to be worth it. K?
__________________
iMac 24" 2.4 GHz, 4 GB RAM, 320 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.6.2
MacBook Air 13" 1.6 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 80 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.6.2
Mac mini 1.83 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 80 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.6.2
MacBook nano (Lenovo S10e white) 1.6 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 250 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.7
iPhone 3GS 32 GB white.

Mac user since 1987, Apple Sales Professional 2009, Apple Product Professional 2007-2009, Apple Certified Support Professional 10.5, Apple Certified Pro Aperture 2 (Level 1)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old June 29th, 2002, 07:37 AM
solrac's Avatar
Quad 6 ghz G5 Tower
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: LA, CA
Posts: 840
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
solrac is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally posted by fryke
Is this the whiner's thread? Okay... OmniWeb will fix your griefs with version 5.0. It's going to take a while, but it's going to be worth it. K?
This thread is called "omniweb 4.1 not viable" not "omniweb 5.0 not viable"

what's the story with 5.0 anyway? Is that supposed to be the official release or something?
__________________
-Soon 2 B mkiv Toyota Supra Twin Turbo 6 Speed --- supraforums.com-
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old June 29th, 2002, 10:07 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 96
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Zimbop is on a distinguished road
Thumbs down

Solrac,

have you contacted Omni about this? What have they said?

I would advise that you test as many browsers as possible and build in some sort of testing proceedure for incompatible browsers, then politely tell those visiting your sites with incompatible browsers where they can update, or which browsers they should fire up for the full experience. This is simply good professional practice, much like serving different CSS to different browsers, or taking into account the fact that the MacOS and Windows most popular browsers actually have different display area sizes even if run in the same resolution, you either bother with this stuff or you don't.

Coming in here an ranting about flash being the future of the web is just a waste of time, don't try and force the world to use the browser you want, be a pro and build in browser sensing into your applications.

Zim
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old June 29th, 2002, 10:35 AM
uoba's Avatar
Re: member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Merseyside, UK
Posts: 1,726
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
uoba is on a distinguished road
What's wrong with complaining about...

an app!

Just 'cause it's created and distributed, and many people like it, doesn't mean with can't critise! That's how apps get better, if you didn't know

Omniweb is documented as lacking in standards, the fact that someone wants to use it for there technology (myself include (iframes)), shows that we actually want to use it!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old June 29th, 2002, 10:39 AM
fryke's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: macosx.com
Posts: 14,075
Thanks: 13
Thanked 90 Times in 85 Posts
fryke is a jewel in the roughfryke is a jewel in the roughfryke is a jewel in the roughfryke is a jewel in the rough
oh, that's perfectly okay.

it's just that it's also documented that it's not complete in those features. the roadmap's been laid open. just search omnigroup.com for details.
__________________
iMac 24" 2.4 GHz, 4 GB RAM, 320 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.6.2
MacBook Air 13" 1.6 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 80 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.6.2
Mac mini 1.83 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 80 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.6.2
MacBook nano (Lenovo S10e white) 1.6 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 250 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.7
iPhone 3GS 32 GB white.

Mac user since 1987, Apple Sales Professional 2009, Apple Product Professional 2007-2009, Apple Certified Support Professional 10.5, Apple Certified Pro Aperture 2 (Level 1)
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old June 29th, 2002, 11:11 AM
evildan's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 1,075
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
evildan is on a distinguished road
[moderator's note:]

Sorry solrac, had to move this thread. It belongs in the Opinion's forum not the Mac OSx System and Software forum. (since its opinion related).



Thread moved by evildan 6/29/02
__________________
//evildan
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Thank God the Witch Is Dead Veljo Mac OS X System & Mac Software 2 June 27th, 2003 06:51 PM
Omniweb updated edX Mac OS X System & Mac Software 1 February 9th, 2003 11:23 AM
Browser Standards: Safari Web Browser PXL Transmitter Opinions, & Open Letters 2 January 15th, 2003 07:31 AM
OmniWeb 4.1 Final fryke Apple News, Rumors & Discussion 15 June 25th, 2002 06:55 AM
Lock Omniweb as the default browser? AlanBDahl Mac OS X System & Mac Software 5 January 22nd, 2002 12:57 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1
Copyright 2000-2010 DigitalCrowd, Inc.