image
image

Go Back   macosx.com > Community > Opinions, & Open Letters

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #9  
Old June 1st, 2005, 03:38 AM
Ceroc Addict's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 561
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Ceroc Addict is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Satcomer
Computers are the most complex home tool in most houses today! That is safe to say. I don't know where computer users got the idea that a computer should never be problem free.
I think this statement's a sad reflection on how the computer industry managed to hoodwink the average consumer.

If consumers had demanded quality (i.e. took back their computers, or at least refused to get new ones) when they crashed, the industry would be forced to churn out stuff slower (i.e. actually have more quality control) and stop using consumers as crash test dummies.

Microsoft should have stopped existing before the term "Blue screen of death" became a commonly understood (and accepted) expression.

Kap

P.S. Funny sidenote: The browser on the linux box I'm on actually crashed as I submitted this post.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old June 1st, 2005, 12:44 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 148
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
contoursvt is on a distinguished road
Cars never break down, TVs never fail, VCRs never chew up tapes, toasters never toast unevenly..etc....

Considering WHAT computers to and the complexity, I'd say its much more reliable than any of the stuff above.

Incidently, my G3 has kernel panics more often than my XP box has blue screens. I've had 3 kernel panics in 1 year and I've had zero bluescreens in 6 months on my new PC. Bluescreens by the way are mostly caused by bad drivers and nothing else. I'd have control over those drivers. Kernel panics might be caused by drivers as well but I have no control of those, OSX is shipped with what I need so if it crashes for some reason, I'm pretty much screwed until apple fixes it. Not so great.

The sad thing is that I use my PC now for 99% of things and the G3 for 1% but even with that kind of ratio, I'm getting less blue screens vs kernel panics. Not trying to be biased but I do have both and this is my experience so far. XP and Win2k are far more stable than anyone gives credit.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old June 2nd, 2005, 12:11 AM
nixgeek's Avatar
Mac of the SubGenius! :-)
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 8,375
Thanks: 29
Thanked 142 Times in 126 Posts
nixgeek is a jewel in the roughnixgeek is a jewel in the roughnixgeek is a jewel in the rough
I think it's a matter of how well you know to configure a system and use the proper "etiquette" for managing your computer, be it a Mac or PC running whatever. And yes, the only times I've had crashes on Windows (XP and 2000) have been because of drivers. For the most part, my systems (Mac/Win/Linux) have been pretty stable and run for a good while.

But it's this "etiquette" that not everyone has when it comes to computer maintenance, as we see moreso in the Windows world with users' lack of updating their systems. Sure, most of that is automated, but it's only helpful if you have an "always on" connection. Dial-up users either have to have their computers dial overnight or they have to update manually when they are connected, while hoping they don't get disconnected.

I see the fault lying on both parties. One for users not being proactive about learning or keeping their computer in top form, and another for the corps not making all of this easy for the end user. If people didn't take preventative maintenance on their cars and the companies didn't make these cars safe to begin with, imagine what hell it would be to cross the street!

I hope this is making sense, especially since I'm typing this with one eye open at 12:11 AM...
__________________
Apple iMac G5 17" (2 GHz G5) - Mac OS X 10.4.11/Ubuntu 9.10
Asus Eee PC 901 (1.6 GHz Atom N270) - Ubuntu Netbook Remix 9.04
Apple Macintosh Quadra 650 (33 MHz MC68040) - Mac OS 8.1
"JHVH-1" (2 GHz AMD Athlon XP 2400+) - Slackware 13
"Kidbuntu" (2.8 GHz Celeron D 335) - Ubuntu 9.04
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old June 2nd, 2005, 12:18 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 148
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
contoursvt is on a distinguished road
I think what you said does make a lot of sense. In my own case, maybe because windows is my primary OS, I like it more and put more attention and effort into system maintenance compared to my G3 so maybe thats why its more stable and vice versa. Guess if you love it, it will love you back LOL
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old June 2nd, 2005, 03:07 AM
Satcomer's Avatar
In Geostationary Orbit
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 6,959
Thanks: 33
Thanked 176 Times in 171 Posts
Satcomer is a jewel in the roughSatcomer is a jewel in the roughSatcomer is a jewel in the roughSatcomer is a jewel in the rough
Quote:
Originally Posted by contoursvt
Guess if you love it, it will love you back LOL
That's true with almost everthing in your life. Just ask an old man like myself.
__________________
Mac Pro Dual 2.8 Quad (1st gen), 6G Ram, Two DVD-RW Drives, OS X 10.6.1
Mac Book Pro Core 2 Duo 2.16Ghz, SuperDrive, ATI X1600, 2GB RAM, OS X 10.6.1
2TB Time Capsule
32G iPhone 3GS Black
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old June 3rd, 2005, 04:44 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 571
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
aicul is on a distinguished road
On the lighter side

Quote:
Originally Posted by Satcomer
Computers are the most complex home tool in most houses today!
After my wife... But then again I wouldn't consider her a tool.
__________________
I'm trying to understand...

Last edited by aicul; June 3rd, 2005 at 04:45 PM. Reason: forgot title
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old June 6th, 2005, 04:00 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 248
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
rubaiyat is on a distinguished road
Well I'm still P*ssed off after yet another reinstall!

I've had my W2k PC for 4 years and that is exactly how many crashes it has had. None of them requiring anything more serious than a restart. I have lost count of how many forced reinstalls I have had to do with my Mac and all the flavors of OSX.

Each time I have lost yet another lot of files, settings, data.

Just got back up and running after yet another what I call blue screen of death in Panther. I get through all the login only to end up with a blue screen with nothing but a live cursor on it.

"Safe Boot" didn't work, Disk First Aid as always wwas useless, and I had all sorts of hastles trying to reinstall Panther. I finally gave up after working on it over a day, and upgraded to Tiger. I just hope Tiger doesn't go flakey on me because it was not a clean reinstall, just an upgrade on top of what was left of the Panther install.

The big trouble with Apple's, less than perfect, Unix is that if you don't work on the same install that gave you trouble you don't get back your User stuff.

I'd love to have a reliable rescue CD, even DiskWarrior as good as it is, is painfully slow and doesn't do everything I need.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old June 7th, 2005, 12:31 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 45
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
ngcomputing is on a distinguished road
OS/X itself might not crash, but applications running under it surely will. Since I switched in November '04 I've must have "Submitted A Report" to Apple at least 100 to 200 times.

XP tends to crash more often than OS/X, however, OS/X applications tend to crash way more often than XP apps.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1
Copyright 2000-2010 DigitalCrowd, Inc.