| |||||||
| View Poll Results: Mac OS X 10.2.1 as fast as Mac OS 9.2.2? | |||
| YESS!! Sure! |     | 6 | 23.08% |
| NO! Mac OS X 10.2 still can be much faster! |    | 15 | 57.69% |
| Dunnow |    | 5 | 19.23% |
| Voters: 26. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
#1
September 20th, 2002, 10:57 AM
| ||||
| ||||
| Mac OS X 10.2.1 as fast as Mac OS 9?
What do you experience?? AppleWatcher
__________________ Signed.  |
|
#2
September 20th, 2002, 11:23 AM
| ||||
| ||||
|
On the same hardware it'll never be as fast as OS 9 IMO. There's just too much more going on in the system for that to happen.
__________________ MacBook Pro 2.16GHz Core2Duo 3GB RAM, G4 1.4GHz OSX Tiger 1.25GB RAM, Dual 2GHz G5 OSX Tiger 2GB RAM (freakin shweet) Athlon 64 Windoze XP for school work (programming) 1GB RAM dferns@macosx.com |
|
#3
September 20th, 2002, 11:59 AM
| ||||
| ||||
| Can Mac OS X get faster then?
Is it possible for Apple to push Mac OS X 10.2 over the limit? Is it possible to make it more faster??? AppleWatcher
__________________ Signed. |
|
#4
September 20th, 2002, 12:07 PM
| ||||
| ||||
|
With something as complicated as Mac OS X, there's always optimizations to be made. Look how long it took Apple to optimize the Classic OS  It'll no doubt get somewhat faster, but won't every be as fast as OS 9 on the same hardware.
__________________ MacBook Pro 2.16GHz Core2Duo 3GB RAM, G4 1.4GHz OSX Tiger 1.25GB RAM, Dual 2GHz G5 OSX Tiger 2GB RAM (freakin shweet) Athlon 64 Windoze XP for school work (programming) 1GB RAM dferns@macosx.com |
|
#5
September 20th, 2002, 12:55 PM
| ||||
| ||||
| Same hardware…
Ask the same question in Feb. 2003 to get X.2 faster than Classic. I'm waiting until then to get on Jag.
__________________ Gone ! Want to keep in touch: email - iChatAV: brat270783 |
|
#6
September 22nd, 2002, 02:45 AM
| ||||
| ||||
|
I noticed a significant speed increase after fresh-installing jag and then repairing priveleges on my iBook 500. It is now quite possibly as fast as it was when running OS 9.
__________________ - iMac G5 1.8GHZ 17" | SuperDrive | 160GB | 512MB | Airport Extreme | Bluetooth Keyboard & Mouse | Wacom Intuos II - Pentax *ist DL - JVC MiniDV Camcorder - Airport Express - iPod Nano 1gb white |
|
#7
October 21st, 2002, 08:40 PM
| ||||
| ||||
|
So long I only use Carbon apps my overall efficiency is about the same with MacOS and OS X. I would say better with OS X because it's stable.
__________________ --- >80 column hard wrapped e-mail is not a sign of intelligent >life |
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| A bit of nostalgia: A Salute to Mac OS X | simX | Apple News, Rumors & Discussion | 31 | March 24th, 2005 07:45 AM |
| HP Photosmart 1315 and USB Print Sharing | zwheeloc | Mac Classic System & Software | 12 | February 6th, 2003 09:20 PM |
| apps list | Mac Osxtopus | Mac OS X System & Mac Software | 7 | May 29th, 2002 12:31 PM |
| Apple: Forget XP, try the Mac | tagliatelle | Bob's Place | 1 | November 25th, 2001 07:12 AM |
| Netscape 6.1 Profile Transfer from Mac OS 9.2.1 to Mac OS X | chemistry_geek | Apple News, Rumors & Discussion | 0 | October 12th, 2001 06:42 PM |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:35 PM.
