image
image

Go Back   macosx.com > Community > Opinions, & Open Letters

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
Old August 9th, 2005, 03:25 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
eddiejoepopcorn is on a distinguished road
OSX vs. Windows

I just bought a new 15-inch GS4, and I like it. However, it really drags its feet when reading this forum, and doing other web activities. When I want to do some web work, I go to my Pentium III, 233 Ghz. running Windows 98se, and using Firefox. It's LOTS faster (at least twice, maybe thrice)! I'm using Safari, which I like better than Microsoft's Internet Explorer. I haven't tested Explorer yet to see if it performs better.

The Mac also has other annoying characteristics, such as View handling in the Finder, but that's another story (thread?)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old August 9th, 2005, 03:40 PM
Mac Metal Head
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 821
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
HateEternal is on a distinguished road
I assume you have 512 MB of RAM? It should really be fine on your PowerBook. I don't have any problems on my 800 mhz iBook which is a lot slower than that PowerBook.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old August 9th, 2005, 04:34 PM
wanna be power user
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 35
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
joneSi is on a distinguished road
I run a p4 at work with XP....SLOW. I have an iBook 1.2ghz 768 ram...rocks. Half the clock speed and runs faster. I also have a slew of Xp and Win 2k boxes / laptops (including one centrino) which run pretty well. The best of which is still no faster than my iBook...
joneSi

edit: how do you change view characteristics for future notice. That is annoying. I want to see list in all except specified (Like photos etc)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old August 9th, 2005, 06:23 PM
nixgeek's Avatar
Mac of the SubGenius! :-)
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 8,375
Thanks: 29
Thanked 142 Times in 126 Posts
nixgeek is a jewel in the roughnixgeek is a jewel in the roughnixgeek is a jewel in the rough
Are you running any antispyware apps or antivirus apps on that Windows 98 SE computer? If not, then I would be wary of sending personal information on it. Thankfully on the Mac, that's not a problem considering you are running a UNIX operating system under the hood and you don't have to worry about those pesky issues. This means you don't have to run any extra apps that slow down your computer. All that memory is being used for USEFUL apps.

And speaking of security, Windows 98 SE is the swiss cheese of operating systems. I hope you aren't sending any personal data on that computer.

Incidentally, if you have gripes with the Mac and the Mac OS, why bother using it? Why not just stick with your PC?
__________________
Apple iMac G5 17" (2 GHz G5) - Mac OS X 10.4.11/Ubuntu 9.10
Asus Eee PC 901 (1.6 GHz Atom N270) - Ubuntu Netbook Remix 9.04
Apple Macintosh Quadra 650 (33 MHz MC68040) - Mac OS 8.1
"JHVH-1" (2 GHz AMD Athlon XP 2400+) - Slackware 13
"Kidbuntu" (2.8 GHz Celeron D 335) - Ubuntu 9.04
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old August 9th, 2005, 06:26 PM
nixgeek's Avatar
Mac of the SubGenius! :-)
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 8,375
Thanks: 29
Thanked 142 Times in 126 Posts
nixgeek is a jewel in the roughnixgeek is a jewel in the roughnixgeek is a jewel in the rough
One more thing. Have you updated your Mac OS? Which version are you running anyways? The only one that began to show any signs of performance was 10.2, and versions beyond that have only gotten better.

RAM is definitely a factor, as was mentioned earlier. Mac OS X loves more RAM, and performs MUCH better once the RAM is sufficient...unlike Windows, which feels slower even with more RAM (I went from 512 MB to 1.5 GB on my Athlon XP running WinXP SP2 and for some reason it feels slower).
__________________
Apple iMac G5 17" (2 GHz G5) - Mac OS X 10.4.11/Ubuntu 9.10
Asus Eee PC 901 (1.6 GHz Atom N270) - Ubuntu Netbook Remix 9.04
Apple Macintosh Quadra 650 (33 MHz MC68040) - Mac OS 8.1
"JHVH-1" (2 GHz AMD Athlon XP 2400+) - Slackware 13
"Kidbuntu" (2.8 GHz Celeron D 335) - Ubuntu 9.04
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old August 9th, 2005, 06:32 PM
fryke's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: macosx.com
Posts: 14,071
Thanks: 13
Thanked 89 Times in 84 Posts
fryke is a jewel in the roughfryke is a jewel in the roughfryke is a jewel in the roughfryke is a jewel in the rough
Well, web browsing simply is quicker on Windows. We don't really need to discuss that any longer. Use that 233 MHz computer for webbrowsing if that's better for you.
__________________
iMac 24" 2.4 GHz, 4 GB RAM, 320 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.6.1
MacBook Air 13" 1.6 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 80 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.6.1
Mac mini 1.83 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 80 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.6.1
MacBook nano (Lenovo S10e white) 1.6 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 250 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.7
iPhone 3GS 32 GB white.

Mac user since 1987, Apple Sales Professional 2009, Apple Product Professional 2007-2009, Apple Certified Support Professional 10.5, Apple Certified Pro Aperture 2 (Level 1)
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old August 9th, 2005, 06:40 PM
nixgeek's Avatar
Mac of the SubGenius! :-)
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 8,375
Thanks: 29
Thanked 142 Times in 126 Posts
nixgeek is a jewel in the roughnixgeek is a jewel in the roughnixgeek is a jewel in the rough
Quote:
Originally Posted by fryke
Well, web browsing simply is quicker on Windows. We don't really need to discuss that any longer. Use that 233 MHz computer for webbrowsing if that's better for you.

That we can thank on corporate MS drone companies that optimize everything for Microsoft without considering standards, which I'm sure would make it an optimal experience for ALL computers running ANY operating system. But such is life...
__________________
Apple iMac G5 17" (2 GHz G5) - Mac OS X 10.4.11/Ubuntu 9.10
Asus Eee PC 901 (1.6 GHz Atom N270) - Ubuntu Netbook Remix 9.04
Apple Macintosh Quadra 650 (33 MHz MC68040) - Mac OS 8.1
"JHVH-1" (2 GHz AMD Athlon XP 2400+) - Slackware 13
"Kidbuntu" (2.8 GHz Celeron D 335) - Ubuntu 9.04
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old August 9th, 2005, 08:04 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 148
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
contoursvt is on a distinguished road
I dont think the problem is that sites are optimized for IE. Heck apple.com comes up faster on the PC. Anyway at my last job, one of the designers was using a dual G4 500 with 768mb RAM and at the time he was running 10.2.x. He asked for a windows box because he wanted to learn a little since he'd never used windows (or not really). All I had was a toshiba satellite PII 300 laptop with 192mb RAM running XP Pro. He comes to me a few weeks later frustrated asking why in gods name is surfing 2x faster on the slow as dirt laptop than on his dual G4. I had no real answer but I watched him surf and I noticed that the browser appeared to be loading pictures and things one at a time but doing a bandwidth test revealed equal bandwidth as the laptop.

If I was using that computer, I would I'd hurl myself over a cliff and then grab the G4 tower with me so we could both plumet to our end.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1
Copyright 2000-2010 DigitalCrowd, Inc.