|
#17
| ||||
| ||||
|
Veljo, Enjoyed reading your comments, I am probably in the minority when I say I really like brushed metal, in fact, everyone I've spoken to in the 'real' world likes it too. More brushed metal for me! Get rid of the cheap, tacky plastic! It does seem like Apple are just using commercial products to beta-test ideas, this is disgusting. You wanna use MY Mac to beta test, fine - but don't bloody well charge ME for the inconvenience! THEN tell me I'm getting something better than I had before! To me, I really feel disappointed by Apple and overall, I'm disappointed a bit by the switch back to Mac. There, I've said it. I never thought I would. The only thing which makes it worthwhile is iLife, it makes many tasks easy and pleasant, as do many Mac applications. I liked Panther, it ran well on my mini and was a joy to use, Tiger is patchy at best. One day it can boot up like lightning, the desktop can appear and it's ready to go, other times it will boot and the desktop appears but another 30 secs elapse before anything is usable because something is still chugging away.. what? where? why? Finder doesn't feel as I think it should, it feels slow, I cannot quantify that and I cannot give an example which is consistantly repeatable. Consistancy is the word here. There seems to be a lack of it. I may be wrong but it feels like Apple are far more interested in tempting spoilt brats of the 'iWhatever generation' with more and more and MORE F***ING music players than computers. Yup, another player doing EXACTLY the same job as the previous model, another player to be added to the growing signature lines of the click-kiddies, another player to cast into the drawer with the others within 3 months. Apple, what are you? Because I REALLY do not know. Get your priorities in order. Perhaps the company should split into two or something, one to play it's little music empire games and one to get on with the business of making decent computers. At the moment it feels like a half-arsed effort with the Mac, "Yeah, we'll just palm them off with this crap until we can sell them PCs, erm, I mean Intel Macs, they're so stupid they won't know the difference. Anyway, let's concentrate on something more fun, another music player!" Apple, you are falling out of favour with me. Rant over.
__________________ MacBook (aluminium) 2GHz Intel Core 2 Duo, 2GB RAM, 160GB HD Mac OS X 10.5.6 Ipod Touch fw. 2.2 |
|
#18
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
So what is the difference in Lisa from Mac? has anyone here seen it?
__________________ PowerPC5200 48mb 80mhz OS8.6 PowerPC7500 192mb 180mhz OS9.2.2 eMac 1.42ghz (now) 1GIG Ram (just added extra 512mb 30/8/07) OSX10.4.10 It Keeps Getting Better!!! |
|
#19
| ||||
| ||||
|
Actually, I made an error in my mentioning of Jobs and the Lisa. If I remember correctly, Jobs was still attached to the Apple II/III line. The Lisa was actually part of Woz's work as well. Sorry for this misinformation. Here's some better information regarding the Apple line, the Lisa/Macintosh line, and Steve Jobs. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History...e_III_and_Lisa
__________________ • Apple iMac G5 17" (2 GHz G5) - Mac OS X 10.4.11/Ubuntu 9.10 • Asus Eee PC 901 (1.6 GHz Atom N270) - Ubuntu 9.10 • Apple Macintosh Quadra 650 (33 MHz MC68040) - Mac OS 8.1 • "JHVH-1" (2 GHz AMD Athlon XP 2400+) - Slackware 13 • "Kidbuntu" (2.8 GHz Celeron D 335) - Ubuntu 9.10 |
|
#20
| ||||
| ||||
|
Lisa screenshots here: http://www.jmusheneaux.com/9001.htm Early Mac (System 1.1/Finder 1.1) screenshots here: http://www.jmusheneaux.com/512k.htm#APPLE Note that the very first Macs were released with System 0.9 or something, but it shouldn't look too different IIRC.
__________________ iMac 24" 2.4 GHz, 4 GB RAM, 320 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.6.2 MacBook Air 13" 1.6 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 80 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.6.2 Mac mini 1.83 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 80 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.6.2 MacBook nano (Lenovo S10e white) 1.6 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 250 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.6.2 iPhone 3GS 32 GB white. Mac user since 1987, Apple Sales Professional 2009, Apple Product Professional 2007-2009, Apple Certified Support Professional 10.5 & 10.6, Apple Certified Pro Aperture 2 (Level 1) |
|
#21
| ||||
| ||||
|
I did start this thread for general gripes about Tiger, rather than Apple history...
__________________ MacBook (aluminium) 2GHz Intel Core 2 Duo, 2GB RAM, 160GB HD Mac OS X 10.5.6 Ipod Touch fw. 2.2 |
|
#22
| ||||
| ||||
|
Wow, Lisa looks/looked AMAZING ![]() My friend has the first Mac, makes me want to go visit him and have a play on it. I remember vaguely roadrunner. And he's little capture device where we had to sit very still to have our picture taken then we looked like photocopies on a sceeen LOL Couldn't say if it was 0.9 fryke, I wasn't system knowledgeable until System 7's and above. Edit Here: Yep sorry fjdouse, say no more. Tiger rocks
__________________ PowerPC5200 48mb 80mhz OS8.6 PowerPC7500 192mb 180mhz OS9.2.2 eMac 1.42ghz (now) 1GIG Ram (just added extra 512mb 30/8/07) OSX10.4.10 It Keeps Getting Better!!! |
|
#23
| ||||
| ||||
|
I've found (for those actually interested in the original point of the thread) that using OnyX to disable the dashboard DOES give some relief to the gloppy performance I've been referring to. Of course, then one is running a crippled system, and as per my experience so far, tomorrow it could run like a bag-o-sh*t when I next boot up. Having already forked out once for a memory upgrade, should I now fork out MORE cash for a 512 to 1GB upgrade? The prices for the memory are so stupidly high, I can't resolve the.. morality ..of spending such amounts on something so.. (can't find the right word).. minor. (?)
__________________ MacBook (aluminium) 2GHz Intel Core 2 Duo, 2GB RAM, 160GB HD Mac OS X 10.5.6 Ipod Touch fw. 2.2 |
|
#24
| ||||
| ||||
|
have you turned beam syncing off in the Quartzdebugger? my performance improved tenfold after that.
__________________ Dual 1.8GHz G5 2GB, 1TB, Radeon 9600XT 128MB, 10.5 20" Apple Cinema Display + Dell 2005FPW 20" dual-head iBook G3 700MHz 640MB, 40GB, Rage128 16MB, 10.4, dying battery |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|