image
image

Go Back   macosx.com > Community > Opinions, & Open Letters

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #17  
Old January 5th, 2006, 08:42 AM
powermac's Avatar
iMac Dual 2.0 17'
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Manhattan NY
Posts: 1,216
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
powermac is on a distinguished road
The best thing is, that we all can have this discussion. Meaning, the variety of web browsers available for the Mac. The one browser I miss is Netscape stand alone browser for OS8-9. That was a great browser, slimmed down, and ran great. In all these discussions, no one ever mentions Netscape. I don't even have it installed on my computer anymore.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old January 5th, 2006, 11:23 AM
fryke's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: macosx.com
Posts: 14,071
Thanks: 13
Thanked 89 Times in 84 Posts
fryke is a jewel in the roughfryke is a jewel in the roughfryke is a jewel in the roughfryke is a jewel in the rough
Well... If *I* remember correctly, Netscape was never "slim" after version 2.x... It became one bloated beast in fact, which the open source guys noticed, too, once Netscape released the mozilla source code. Nowadays, "Netscape", as a product, is basically dead, since it's merely a repackaged mozilla/Firefox which is never up-to-date with the open source development. Hence people are using Firefox instead.
__________________
iMac 24" 2.4 GHz, 4 GB RAM, 320 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.6.1
MacBook Air 13" 1.6 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 80 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.6.1
Mac mini 1.83 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 80 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.6.1
MacBook nano (Lenovo S10e white) 1.6 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 250 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.7
iPhone 3GS 32 GB white.

Mac user since 1987, Apple Sales Professional 2009, Apple Product Professional 2007-2009, Apple Certified Support Professional 10.5, Apple Certified Pro Aperture 2 (Level 1)
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old January 5th, 2006, 01:21 PM
nixgeek's Avatar
Mac of the SubGenius! :-)
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 8,375
Thanks: 29
Thanked 142 Times in 126 Posts
nixgeek is a jewel in the roughnixgeek is a jewel in the roughnixgeek is a jewel in the rough
The only thing that bothers me about the mozilla team is that even though they are open source, no one is making the effort to port the latest version to OS 9. Is it that difficult a task to do so? After all, it IS open source and anyone can take the source code and modify it to work with OS 9.
__________________
Apple iMac G5 17" (2 GHz G5) - Mac OS X 10.4.11/Ubuntu 9.10
Asus Eee PC 901 (1.6 GHz Atom N270) - Ubuntu Netbook Remix 9.04
Apple Macintosh Quadra 650 (33 MHz MC68040) - Mac OS 8.1
"JHVH-1" (2 GHz AMD Athlon XP 2400+) - Slackware 13
"Kidbuntu" (2.8 GHz Celeron D 335) - Ubuntu 9.04
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old January 6th, 2006, 04:09 AM
Viro's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 2,494
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Viro will become famous soon enoughViro will become famous soon enough
The question is whether there is a demand for apps on OS 9. After all, that OS has been officially dead for how many years now?
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old January 6th, 2006, 04:21 AM
Mikuro's Avatar
Crotchety UI Nitpicker
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,679
Thanks: 6
Thanked 50 Times in 46 Posts
Mikuro will become famous soon enough
Netscape was a beast. And I mean that in a bad way. It was huge, and ate up tons of RAM. Netscape 2 was nice. 3 was reasonably lean. 4 was bloated. And after that it was just a sad shadow of what it once was, in terms of speed, features, usability, and just about everything else. It was just Mozilla's uglier, dumber brother.

I miss iCab. I know iCab is still around, but....well, I miss when it was fast and modern. When it first came out, it smacked everything else around soooo hard. And it was small, too. It's still my browser of choice for OS 9 (and 7 and 8, for that matter!), with a third-party build of Mozilla (not up to date, but closer than the official one, at least) as my backup.
__________________
Mac mini — 1.25GHz G4, 1GB RAM — OS 10.5.8

Useful programs: Privoxy, Butler, ffmpegX, VLC, Perian, Tofu, Wcalc
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old January 6th, 2006, 11:57 AM
nixgeek's Avatar
Mac of the SubGenius! :-)
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 8,375
Thanks: 29
Thanked 142 Times in 126 Posts
nixgeek is a jewel in the roughnixgeek is a jewel in the roughnixgeek is a jewel in the rough
iCab 3.0 is available now for PPC systems running Classic Mac OS. I tested it out and it's pretty good, especially when rendering sites. However, even though the demand isn't that high, not that many people have a desperate need to upgrade to OS X. Some people are just fine with OS and below. For this reason I don't understand why someone hasn't taken up the task to port FF, or even the Mozilla Suite (which is going to live on as SeaMonkey) at the very least. It doesn't have to have EVERY little fix that comes out, but at least to update it so that security-wise it's up to snuff.
__________________
Apple iMac G5 17" (2 GHz G5) - Mac OS X 10.4.11/Ubuntu 9.10
Asus Eee PC 901 (1.6 GHz Atom N270) - Ubuntu Netbook Remix 9.04
Apple Macintosh Quadra 650 (33 MHz MC68040) - Mac OS 8.1
"JHVH-1" (2 GHz AMD Athlon XP 2400+) - Slackware 13
"Kidbuntu" (2.8 GHz Celeron D 335) - Ubuntu 9.04
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1
Copyright 2000-2010 DigitalCrowd, Inc.