image
image

|


Go Back   macosx.com > Community > Opinions, & Open Letters

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #25  
Old February 5th, 2006, 04:31 PM
ergo proxy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: City 17
Posts: 49
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
ergo proxy is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by dmetzcher
I actually hate the terms "Intel Mac", "MacTel", and "MacIntel", and prefer "Intel-based Mac". Intel really has nothing at all to do with the machine. It's just the chip. I can't wait until they are all Intel-based, and the PowerPC machines have long faded, so we can just refer to them as Macs.
Those were the names floating around after the Intel announcement. So I was kind of glad they decided not to include the Intel name.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dmetzcher
As far as AMD is concerned (and this is way off-topic, I know), I hope they do start putting their chips in the Macs after a while. A company like Intel should not have so much power.
Well, since were now on the x86 road map, that could be a possibility,
maybe in the high end PowerMac er I mean Mac Pro Systems.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old February 5th, 2006, 05:42 PM
ScottW's Avatar
Founder
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Overland Park, KS
Posts: 3,164
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 2 Posts
ScottW is on a distinguished road
Why don't they just call it the PowerBook Duo?

Oh... that has already happened.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old February 5th, 2006, 06:12 PM
MyMacBlog.com
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: New Jersey, USA
Posts: 538
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
dmetzcher is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScottW
Why don't they just call it the PowerBook Duo?

Oh... that has already happened.
They want "Mac" in the names of all their computers, according to Jobs at the keynote.

i.e. - iMac, Mac mini, PowerMac
Now we'll have the MacBook Pro (to replace the PowerBook), and, I assume, the MacBook (to replace the iBook.) The names stink, frankly. I think "iBook" and "PowerBook" were perfect.
__________________
Dennis R. Metzcher
MyMacBlog.com: My experiences with the Mac OS, a switcher's point of view. With a new Mac tip each week day.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old February 5th, 2006, 06:48 PM
fryke's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: macosx.com
Posts: 13,029
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
fryke has a spectacular aura aboutfryke has a spectacular aura about
While we _assume_ that they'll rename the iBook to MacBook or "MacBook mini" or something similar, it's not a done deal just yet. Maybe both the iMac and the iBook will keep their names? Then again, I truly *hope* we'll have a final lineup of this:

Mac (was iMac)
Mac mini (was Mac mini)
Mac Pro (was PowerMac)
MacBook (was iBook)
MacBook nano (flash-memory based super sub-notebook)
MacBook Pro (was PowerBook)

(I know, I sneaked my wish for a subnotebook in there, can't help it...)
__________________
MacBook Air 13" 1.6 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 80 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.4
MacBook 13" 1.83 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 160 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.4
Hackintosh Core2Duo 2.4 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 160 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.4
iPhone 3G 16 GB (v2), AppleTV 1G 40 GB (v2)

Mac user since 1987, Apple Product Professional 2007, 2008.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old February 5th, 2006, 11:39 PM
ergo proxy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: City 17
Posts: 49
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
ergo proxy is on a distinguished road
iMac is going to be called just Mac??

A: " I hear that you have a Mac at home, which model? "
B: " I have a Mac."
A: " I know, but which one?"
B: " A Mac, that all in one computer. They use to call it the iMac but now it simply called a 'Mac'."

Sub notebook? that's a good idea, I could definately use one.
8" screen w/ tablet functionality would be cool.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old February 6th, 2006, 01:00 AM
fryke's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: macosx.com
Posts: 13,029
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
fryke has a spectacular aura aboutfryke has a spectacular aura about
You're right. They can't really get rid of the "i" in "iMac" for that reason. ... Although I've heard _plenty_ of people referring to their iMac as "the Mac" already (even being puzzled when I called it the "iMac"...) and others who referred to their iBooks as iMacs... Hm...
__________________
MacBook Air 13" 1.6 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 80 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.4
MacBook 13" 1.83 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 160 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.4
Hackintosh Core2Duo 2.4 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 160 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.4
iPhone 3G 16 GB (v2), AppleTV 1G 40 GB (v2)

Mac user since 1987, Apple Product Professional 2007, 2008.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Stupid DVD got stuck in my Powerbook ! Help! Ghostwriter Hardware & Peripherals 6 October 26th, 2005 02:53 PM
Boycott MacMall?? Corpus Opinions, & Open Letters 4 February 16th, 2003 06:04 PM
Boycott the Saudi's. dont buy their gas! <----- PowermacG4_450 Bob's Place 39 February 14th, 2003 07:39 AM
Stupid Powerbook Question...dealing with the sun twister Hardware & Peripherals 2 June 6th, 2002 10:01 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:36 AM.


Mac Support® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright 2000-2008 DigitalCrowd, Inc.