image
image

Go Back   macosx.com > Community > Opinions, & Open Letters

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #9  
Old January 17th, 2008, 04:05 AM
fryke's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: macosx.com
Posts: 14,071
Thanks: 13
Thanked 89 Times in 84 Posts
fryke is a jewel in the roughfryke is a jewel in the roughfryke is a jewel in the roughfryke is a jewel in the rough
With the SSD harddrive, it's almost my perfect subnote. Its screen and overall footprint is *MUCH* too large, but the weight and thickness are okay. So there _is_ a need. For me. However: It's much too expensive with the SSD. I still want one, but I won't buy one just now. It might become a Cube (or has to go down in price).
__________________
iMac 24" 2.4 GHz, 4 GB RAM, 320 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.6.1
MacBook Air 13" 1.6 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 80 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.6.1
Mac mini 1.83 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 80 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.6.1
MacBook nano (Lenovo S10e white) 1.6 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 250 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.7
iPhone 3GS 32 GB white.

Mac user since 1987, Apple Sales Professional 2009, Apple Product Professional 2007-2009, Apple Certified Support Professional 10.5, Apple Certified Pro Aperture 2 (Level 1)
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old January 17th, 2008, 10:43 AM
Natobasso's Avatar
Tech-Bot 5000
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 3,267
Thanks: 1
Thanked 16 Times in 16 Posts
Natobasso is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Qion View Post
Greg has a good point; myself and most of the people contributing to this forum are not in the target market of the MacBook Air. A traveling airplane-oriented executive type would buy it all day long I suppose; however, it's not something practical for a majority of we artists and IT people.

I'll admit I had my own idea of what the new MacBook would look like, and it was quite a bit more risquι than the Air. Touchscreen instead of a keyboard, what.
The problem is, it doesn't compete with larger laptops for screen real estate, and it doesn't compete with smaller micro-laptops like the Sony Vaio either in it's 13" size. It has other drawbacks already mentioned due to the lack of space and physical hard drive. Seems like it's stuck between two worlds with this iteration. I think they would have been better served making a mini laptop on this go around and at least committing to the business traveller 100%.

As it is, what we have is a nice extension of the keyboard that was released earlier this year (see the similarity?!) that is trying to have a foot in both worlds for mass appeal. This worked for the ipod, but it doesn't work for a laptop in my opinion.

Maybe this is a foot in the door to an entire range of 'flash drive' based laptops?
__________________
http://thesalon.blogspot.com

Last edited by Natobasso; January 17th, 2008 at 10:58 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old January 17th, 2008, 12:36 PM
fryke's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: macosx.com
Posts: 14,071
Thanks: 13
Thanked 89 Times in 84 Posts
fryke is a jewel in the roughfryke is a jewel in the roughfryke is a jewel in the roughfryke is a jewel in the rough
The business traveller is the one who'll _appreciate_ the 13" goodness 100%. He's mainly worried about the _weight_ and _thickness_ of the device. I guess he won't mind the screen real estate. 13" is okay even when flying coach.

Then again, the thing has an incredibly large _FRAME_ for something that tries to be small and light. _That's_ the thing I don't really get, why they had to keep the MacBook's incredilarge frame around the screen and keyboard.
__________________
iMac 24" 2.4 GHz, 4 GB RAM, 320 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.6.1
MacBook Air 13" 1.6 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 80 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.6.1
Mac mini 1.83 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 80 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.6.1
MacBook nano (Lenovo S10e white) 1.6 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 250 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.7
iPhone 3GS 32 GB white.

Mac user since 1987, Apple Sales Professional 2009, Apple Product Professional 2007-2009, Apple Certified Support Professional 10.5, Apple Certified Pro Aperture 2 (Level 1)
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old January 17th, 2008, 01:23 PM
Qion's Avatar
Uber Nothing
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: In a democrazy.
Posts: 2,405
Thanks: 50
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Qion will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by fryke View Post
Then again, the thing has an incredibly large _FRAME_ for something that tries to be small and light. _That's_ the thing I don't really get, why they had to keep the MacBook's incredilarge frame around the screen and keyboard.
That's something that escapes me. I don't think the extra space around the screen and keyboard adds any aesthetic value; in fact, it detracts from the overall effect.
__________________
• 2.66GHz Mac Pro Quad Xeon
• 2.0GHz Dual PowerMac G5
• 466MHz Powerbook G4
• Mac Classic
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old January 17th, 2008, 01:45 PM
Natobasso's Avatar
Tech-Bot 5000
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 3,267
Thanks: 1
Thanked 16 Times in 16 Posts
Natobasso is on a distinguished road
It's probably required for the wiring to keep the over height flatter for the screen and the entire notebook. I'm sure if they could have made it thinner they would have (just look at the iphone: Pretty thin edges there! Ha ha)
__________________
http://thesalon.blogspot.com
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old January 18th, 2008, 08:46 AM
fryke's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: macosx.com
Posts: 14,071
Thanks: 13
Thanked 89 Times in 84 Posts
fryke is a jewel in the roughfryke is a jewel in the roughfryke is a jewel in the roughfryke is a jewel in the rough
It probably went like this:

1.) We could remove the frames or make them smaller.
2.) We'd need to add a little thickness for the battery, then.
3.) Well then let's _not_ remove the frames or make them smaller, because else Sony is going to release a notebook that's thinner than ours and we won't be able to say ours is the thinnest in the world any longer. I'm sure people will understand that the most important thing here is not to actually deliver a really good subnotebook, but rather to "think different" and to be able to brag. A lot.

Actually, it probably didn't go down like that, but I'm sure the battery life was an issue. While you can have the battery take any form with Li-Polymer, it still needs volume, and if you don't give it volume with any thickness of the notebook, then it needs the larger area instead. (And to that I'd say: Double the battery life by increasing the thickness by a few millimeters.)
__________________
iMac 24" 2.4 GHz, 4 GB RAM, 320 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.6.1
MacBook Air 13" 1.6 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 80 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.6.1
Mac mini 1.83 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 80 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.6.1
MacBook nano (Lenovo S10e white) 1.6 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 250 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.7
iPhone 3GS 32 GB white.

Mac user since 1987, Apple Sales Professional 2009, Apple Product Professional 2007-2009, Apple Certified Support Professional 10.5, Apple Certified Pro Aperture 2 (Level 1)
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old January 18th, 2008, 01:59 PM
Qion's Avatar
Uber Nothing
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: In a democrazy.
Posts: 2,405
Thanks: 50
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Qion will become famous soon enough
I found a blog article that I personally think is brilliant:

http://blackfriarsinc.com/blog/2008/...oduct-in-right

Quote:
If you're an executive at Ralph Lauren or Prada, the ugliness of carrying around a Dell laptop would give you hives. For these people, style and design isn't a luxury; it's an essential job requirement. And its a category of people whom the computer industry has not served well to date with boxy designs, techie jargon, and a general rejection of the value of fashion. Said another way, how many computers look good with an Armani suit?
__________________
• 2.66GHz Mac Pro Quad Xeon
• 2.0GHz Dual PowerMac G5
• 466MHz Powerbook G4
• Mac Classic
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old January 18th, 2008, 02:54 PM
chevy's Avatar
Leopardo Da Vinci
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Inside the black box, CH
Posts: 3,967
Thanks: 1
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
chevy is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by fryke View Post
[...]
Then again, the thing has an incredibly large FRAME for something that tries to be small and light. That's the thing I don't really get, why they had to keep the MacBook's incredilarge frame around the screen and keyboard.
Imagine using it on your seat in a plane... you'll really hate this extra frame. I don't understand neither. But it's clearly a very great device.
__________________
My current machine is an iMac Core 2 Duo 2.16 GHz 24" and a MacBook Pro 13" with MacOS X 10.6. My oldest Apple was born in 1977.
GS/P/>SS d-(++) s+: a+ C+(C) U* P L+ E--- W++ N- o+ K? w O-- M++ V PS+ PE+ Y- PGP t+ 5 X+ R tv-- b+++ DI++ D+ G e+++ h---- r+++ y?
Time is not changing, I'm just traveling through time.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1
Copyright 2000-2010 DigitalCrowd, Inc.