image
image

Go Back   macosx.com > Mac Help Forums > Switchers (Windows to Mac Converts)

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #105  
Old December 4th, 2006, 06:14 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 3
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
cyberprop is on a distinguished road
[sarcasm]thnx for that mario really helpfull reply[/sarcasm]

so can anyone actually suggest a method of selecting specific photos as i go through them without having to either delete the ones i don't want or then going back through and selecting with mouse and and apple option to select specific ones can get annoying with 1000+ photos especially if you miss click.

Giles
Reply With Quote
  #106  
Old December 4th, 2006, 07:16 PM
Lt Major Burns's Avatar
"Dicky" Charlteston-Burns
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Manchester
Posts: 3,333
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Lt Major Burns has a spectacular aura aboutLt Major Burns has a spectacular aura aboutLt Major Burns has a spectacular aura about
drop them into an album, as in iTunes with playlists. then you can keep track of the ones you want.

also, to export in different fliesizes to different places, go File > Export.
__________________
Dual 1.8GHz G5 2GB, 1TB, Radeon 9600XT 128MB, 10.5
20" Apple Cinema Display + Dell 2005FPW 20" dual-head
iBook G3 700MHz
640MB, 40GB, Rage128 16MB, 10.4, dying battery
Reply With Quote
  #107  
Old December 4th, 2006, 08:46 PM
ex2bot's Avatar
Mac Fanbot
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: live?
Posts: 1,447
Thanks: 1
Thanked 16 Times in 15 Posts
ex2bot is on a distinguished road
Cyberprop,

Awhile ago, MacAddict magazine dumped 250,000 pictures into iPhoto 6 (the latest). It didn't work so well. Glitchy!!

So, I would think twice before dropping all 150,000 pix into iPhoto. 10,000? 20,000? Probably fine. Not 150,000.

What about running Picassa in Parallels? You'd have to buy Parallels and have a copy of Windows. Just a thought. I've never run Picassa so I don't know how it would handle 150,000 pix.

Doug
__________________
Please click THANKS if you found this information useful.
"Just as some newborn race of super-intelligent robots is about to consume all humanity, our dear old species will likely be saved by a Windows crash. The poor robots will linger pathetically. Windows will apologize to them for the inconvenience." -Anonymous (with modifications)
Reply With Quote
  #108  
Old December 4th, 2006, 09:26 PM
eric2006's Avatar
iMovie Professional
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 3,210
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
eric2006 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by dktrickey View Post
Awhile ago, MacAddict magazine dumped 250,000 pictures into iPhoto 6 (the latest). It didn't work so well. Glitchy!!
If you really have that many pictures, you'd be better off with something like Aperture.
__________________
Power to Burn.
At speeds of up to 733MHz,
The most powerful Mac in history
burns CDs, burns DVDs, and
burns Pentiums

- apple website, oct 4, 1999. advertisement for the powermac g4
Reply With Quote
  #109  
Old December 22nd, 2006, 03:48 AM
darkhighway's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
darkhighway is on a distinguished road
I don't know....I've given iphoto (5/6) plenty of chances to make me forget about Picasa and it's not really happening. I've had too many problems with the database in iphoto getting corrupted. iphoto doesn't have the cool inset picture when you zoom in on an image. iphoto doesn't have native IPTC embedding like Picasa does (with the captions). Picasa is really the only thing I miss about using PCs. Aperture is really nice, but it's still needs a bit of work in terms of performance and features.........mainly the web export feature and the fact that it doesn't seem to have very good image compression for saving web photos. What is really promising is Adobe Lightroom (currently in beta). It's development is almost completely driven by user feedback. I've found that a great program for batch editing is Graphic Converter X. It's an excellent value and even though a copy came with my computer, I decided to support the developer by purchasing it separately. It would probably rival Photoshop as a retouching tool if they'd only allow users to custom configure the keyboard shortcuts.....plus the GUI needs to be revamped. If you're looking to just manage/view alot of photos (without much editing), a great program to try is PhotoGrid. Drag and drop a folder to the photogrid icon on the dock and you can get a quick view of all photos (including the ones in subdirectories) and then move/copy or edit them in Photoshop. I've found Adobe Bridge to be too bulky in its feature set and it loading time seems to take awhile (although I'm only using a late model Powerbook with 1.5gigs of RAM).
Reply With Quote
  #110  
Old December 27th, 2006, 11:47 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
geewillikerz is on a distinguished road
Add me to the list of Mac lovers who don't love iPhoto. Picasa is the one thing I really miss about windows and I would love to see it ported to OSX. I switched to Mac a couple of years ago and I am still struggling with iPhoto... I still can't easily accomplish fairly mundane tasks without pulling my hair out.

My wife works in the same room as me on her windows machine and it embarasses me how much easier it is to do ANYTHING on picasa than it is in iPhoto. Way faster on her old windows box than iPhoto is on my much newer Mac, too.

Otherwise, I love my Mac.
Reply With Quote
  #111  
Old December 27th, 2006, 07:59 PM
Satcomer's Avatar
In Geostationary Orbit
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 7,015
Thanks: 34
Thanked 182 Times in 177 Posts
Satcomer is a jewel in the roughSatcomer is a jewel in the roughSatcomer is a jewel in the roughSatcomer is a jewel in the rough
Well boys there is now the Picasa Web Albums Uploaders and the Google Picasa Web Album site. I know this is not what you wanted, but it might due for now.
__________________
Mac Pro Dual 2.8 Quad (1st gen), 14G Ram, Two DVD-RW Drives, OS X 10.6.2
Mac Book Pro Core 2 Duo 2.16Ghz, SuperDrive, ATI X1600, 2GB RAM, OS X 10.6.2
2TB Time Capsule
32G iPhone 3GS Black
Reply With Quote
  #112  
Old December 29th, 2006, 09:13 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 3
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
cyberprop is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by eric2006 View Post
If you really have that many pictures, you'd be better off with something like Aperture.

i have apature and have started loading my photos in but its slow, even on my new mac book pro, albeit i only have 2gb of ram but still shouldn't be as slow as it is. i'm running osx stripped down while i run it nothing but bare minimum running inc dock switched off. but it allows me to do what i want and rate certain pics and edit on the fly just wished it ran a bit quicker, i will investigate pararells. picasa ran fine on my old pc with that many photos just struggled a bit with the raw images flying through them in full size.

thnx for all that have helped

gi
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
X11 and Programs bobw Unix & X11 4 February 12th, 2003 05:32 PM
Any good graphics programs out there? whitesaint Software Programming & Web Scripting 6 July 29th, 2001 03:00 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1
Copyright 2000-2010 DigitalCrowd, Inc.