|
#145
| ||||
| ||||
| kodak
Just tried the latest version of Kodak Easyshare software. Having tried previous versions I wasn't impressed at all, but this one (version 6) seems to be much improved. It's easily customised and integrates with external programs pretty well. It seems much more responsive than iPhoto as each folder is displayed seperately and doesn't create various library files etc. It has a nice clean brushed metal interface so fits in with OS X nicely. Automatically displays all your videos in a 'smart album' for those that have videos scattered amongst their photos. There's the usual editing features, maybe not as extensive as Picasa or iPhoto, but it can be easily configured to edit pics in an external program. Lots of other nice features too. I really like iPhoto but having a large amount of photos does seem to slow it down too much. I'd love to see Picasa on the Mac but seems Google don't feel like competing with iPhoto. Here's a link to Easyshare on download.com (universal binary) Kodak-EasyShare-Software-for-Mac |
|
#146
| |||
| |||
| Quote:
As it happens, I stopped using iPhoto Buddy quite quickly, because it turned out to be not as useful as I'd initially thought. I now just keep my photos organized in folders in the Finder (titled by date + descriptive name) and use Preview to view batches of them, and ImageWell to crop and resize them for posting online or emailing them. As far as keeping the photos organized and searchable by keywords, I'm considering going back to the system I used when I was doing film photography, which involved having a simple spreadsheet where I could organize my entire list of photos by any particular keyword (using one per column). This would just point me to the location of the photos. This is probably not appealing to most people, but it was a system that suited me quite well. Unless I find a better solution with a photo viewing program, I'll probably revert to this. |
|
#147
| |||
| |||
|
What a thread. Any updates to the Picasa/Mac rumors since the one's that circulated around January of this year? Any other new programs out there to check out? iPhoto (6.0.6) just isn't right for me. |
|
#148
| |||
| |||
|
I'm new to both this forum as well as Mac. . . I bought a MacBook about two weeks ago and I love it. I found this thread searching for an answer to an iPhoto alternate. . . I like how it works and edits, etc. but I cannot stand how it does not integrate with my pictures folder! On Picasa, changes made to pictures in their folders were reflected in Picasa and vice versa. For example, I just rearranged 3000+ pictures in iPhoto only to find the changes were not reflected in my pictures folder. This is extremely inconvenient when trying to upload pictures onto websites. Also, the new events I created in iPhoto are no where to be found in my pictures folder! In Picasa, a new "event" created also creates a new folder in Pictures. I love my Mac, but I want Picasa back! I appreciate iPhoto for what it does, but the integration with my Pictures folder is crucial to me. |
|
#149
| |||
| |||
| Picasa is available by google for mac
chek out . Its launched. http://picasa.google.com/mac/ Well, I certainly beleive google took complete idea of making picasa from iPhoto since what iPhoto can do it in the most elegant way, may be picasa does not do.. Still if u wanted picasa on mac, its there and u can use the way... Best things in iPhoto in mac is the user is not bothered about where the fotos are getting stored.. entire file manageemnt is done internally in the best spaces by iphoto and mac OS X which will reduce the file redundancy in the hard disk and giving us better ways to store the maximum content and speedy operations |
|
#150
| ||||
| ||||
|
No, Picasa wasn't originally developed by Google. It was another great company called Idealab that created Picasa. Google acquired it in mid 2004. Picasa was started in 2001 as a online photo sharing application and has evolved quite a bit since then. iPhoto was first released in 2002 so I don't think Idealab was trying to copy iPhoto. They may have been inspired by some of its features, but it's difficult to say.
|
|
#151
| ||||
| ||||
|
ACDSEE is only one program for me to watch photo.
|
|
#152
| ||||
| ||||
| And this program is beneficial for Mac OS X users how again?... http://store.acdsee.com/store/acd/en...ctID.106893200
__________________ • Apple iMac G5 17" (2 GHz G5) - Mac OS X 10.4.11/Ubuntu 9.10 • Asus Eee PC 901 (1.6 GHz Atom N270) - Ubuntu Netbook Remix 9.04 • Apple Macintosh Quadra 650 (33 MHz MC68040) - Mac OS 8.1 • "JHVH-1" (2 GHz AMD Athlon XP 2400+) - Slackware 13 • "Kidbuntu" (2.8 GHz Celeron D 335) - Ubuntu 9.04 |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| X11 and Programs | bobw | Unix & X11 | 4 | February 12th, 2003 05:32 PM |
| Any good graphics programs out there? | whitesaint | Software Programming & Web Scripting | 6 | July 29th, 2001 03:00 AM |