|
#9
January 8th, 2006, 07:29 PM
| |||
| |||
| As a Mac-er I prefer iPhoto, it's just always been there. I have seen Picassa in use and although I cant comment on speed the only major difference I picked up on was the use of funky sliders instead of folders. At the end of the day the functions are pretty much the same.  |
|
#10
January 8th, 2006, 11:14 PM
| ||||
| ||||
 did someone put that picasa ad on this page or is it just some incredible coincidence?  Edit: The ad changed, i guess it was an incredible coincidence! BTW, it was a google ad for a software program called "Picasa" a photo management program..
__________________ Mac Mini Core 2 Duo 1 GB RAM ---------------------------------------------------------- Custom Mac OS X Software and Custom Websites |
|
#11
January 9th, 2006, 12:39 PM
| ||||
| ||||
| iPhoto has always been quite slow for me, even on a 1.33 GHz G4, with 1.25 GB of RAM and a 7.2K hard drive. It's especially slow when loading up, don't ask me why, but it just is. Maybe one day, they'll sort it out. |
|
#12
January 9th, 2006, 12:41 PM
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
Google ads pick up on key text on the page and shows ads relating to it. it saw picassa, searched for adverts, and displayed them.
__________________ Dual 1.8GHz G5 2GB, 1TB, Radeon 9600XT 128MB, 10.5 20" Apple Cinema Display + Dell 2005FPW 20" dual-head iBook G3 700MHz 640MB, 40GB, Rage128 16MB, 10.4, dying battery |
|
#13
January 9th, 2006, 12:41 PM
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
Mac SE?
__________________ Dual 1.8GHz G5 2GB, 1TB, Radeon 9600XT 128MB, 10.5 20" Apple Cinema Display + Dell 2005FPW 20" dual-head iBook G3 700MHz 640MB, 40GB, Rage128 16MB, 10.4, dying battery |
|
#14
January 9th, 2006, 12:52 PM
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
__________________ • Apple iMac G5 17" (2 GHz G5) - Mac OS X 10.4.11 • Apple Macintosh Quadra 650 (33 MHz MC68040) - Mac OS 8.1 • Apple PowerBook Duo 230 (33 MHz MC68030) - System 7.1 • "JHVH-1" (2 GHz AMD Athlon XP 2400+) - Slackware 12.1 • "Kidbuntu" (2.8 GHz Celeron D 335) - Ubuntu 8.04 |
|
#15
January 10th, 2006, 09:20 PM
| ||||
| ||||
| Ok barryrueger et al. Can you give us some examples of what you couldn't figure out in iPhoto? I haven't used Picassa (yet -- but I'm downloading it to try on my Power Mac.), so I'm not criticizing your opinions. To be honest, I finally decided to really trust my photo collection to iPhoto after, what, three years? So, I'm in the process of learning more about how it works. One last question. Did you try out the (until today) latest version of iPhoto, in iLife '05? Doug
__________________ "Just as some newborn race of superintelligent robots are about to consume all humanity, our dear old species will likely be saved by a Windows crash. The poor robots will linger pathetically, begging us to reboot them, even though they'll know it would do no good." - Anonymous Last edited by ex2bot; January 10th, 2006 at 09:34 PM. |
|
#16
January 15th, 2006, 08:37 AM
| |||
| |||
 I too have moved from picasa and.... I am also looking for a picasa replacement. The main issue I have with iPhoto is that it want's to manage my picture folders. I hope I have missed something. The issue is I have 5+ years or so worth of digital pictures in folders that I have sorted by date. I don't want iPhoto to re-arrange them for me. I want the folder structure to remain the same and iPhoto to just scan them. This way I am not stuck to iPhoto if I choose to change in a year. Any thoughts? Roger |
 |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| X11 and Programs | bobw | Unix & X11 | 4 | February 12th, 2003 04:32 PM |
| Any good graphics programs out there? | whitesaint | Software Programming & Web Scripting | 6 | July 29th, 2001 02:00 AM |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:05 AM.
