image
image

Go Back   macosx.com > Mac Help Forums > Switchers (Windows to Mac Converts)

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old December 25th, 2005, 08:55 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 40
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
IceDigger is on a distinguished road
Any good programs like Picasa for Mac?

Are there any good picture viewing programs like Picasa but for Mac? I tried out iPhoto but did not like it.
__________________
Mac Pro 2.66GHz, 3GB RAM, 320GB+500GB HDDs
iPhone 8GB
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old December 26th, 2005, 02:58 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 771
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thank The Cheese is on a distinguished road
What are you going to be doing? Will you simply be storing/printing/viewing photos, or are you wanting to edit them too? And what sort of photos - family snaps, or more professional photos/designs?

I'm surprised you don't like iPhoto, plus it doesn't sound like you gave it much of a go.

I've never used Picasa, but I've used plenty of other photo management apps and iPhoto beats them all. What sets iPhoto above the rest IMO is its powerful searching capabilities. If you apply comments and keywords to your photos you can use the various search methods to find photos fast. If using it for family photos, you can't beat iPhoto's slideshows for a quick and impressive gift for grandma!

Anyway, enough ranting. If you don't like it you don't like it.

I've heard good things about iView Media Pro (21 day trial available)
__________________
Podwatch: Podcast Reviews: Blog | Podcast

iPhone: 8GB, 1.1.3, Unlocked | MacBook Pro: 2Ghz CoreDuo, 2GB RAM, OS X 10.5.2 | Apple TV: 160GB
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old December 26th, 2005, 08:20 AM
nixgeek's Avatar
Mac of the SubGenius! :-)
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 7,536
Thanks: 13
Thanked 87 Times in 71 Posts
nixgeek has a spectacular aura aboutnixgeek has a spectacular aura aboutnixgeek has a spectacular aura about
I've used Picasa, and it's almost exactly like iPhoto. In fact, Picasa is the non-Apple, Windows answer to iPhoto. I think you're trying to work with iPhoto asif it were Picasa, which is usually not a goodidea to do in general with any software package, even operating systems. Learn to use iPhoto and you'll see that it's very useful.
__________________
Apple iMac G5 17" (2 GHz G5) - Mac OS X 10.4.11
Apple Macintosh Quadra 650 (33 MHz MC68040) - Mac OS 8.1
Apple PowerBook Duo 230 (33 MHz MC68030) - System 7.1
"JHVH-1" (2 GHz AMD Athlon XP 2400+) - Slackware 12.1
"Kidbuntu" (2.8 GHz Celeron D 335) - Ubuntu 8.04
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old December 26th, 2005, 04:44 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 5
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
barryrueger is on a distinguished road
"I've never used Picasa, but ..."

I'm with IceDigger on this one. Picassa is <i>dramatically</i> better than iPhoto and I've also been searching for a Mac equivalent. In a nutshell, Picassa manages to do everything that I need, makes it insanely easy to to find pictures, and does so in a manner that - oh I hate to say this - is totally seamless and intuitive.

If getting up and running took even one tenth of the time that I've wasted trying to use iPhoto I would have deleted Picassa immediately.

I'm not sure how long nixgeek spent looking at Picassa, but it most certainly is nothing like iPhoto.

I've spent a couple of hours with the latter and have had nothing but irritation.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old December 26th, 2005, 08:04 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 771
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thank The Cheese is on a distinguished road
bit harsh there barryruger. iPhoto isn't for everyone but I can;t believe it could provoke such hatred. Even if Picasa is better than iPhoto, iPhoto is still a great app in its own right.

I find the people who talk badly about iPhoto are usually those who A) Don't give it a chance; or B) Have a slower system (Admittedly, iPhoto does need an awfully powerful system considering the type of app it is - which is certainly a downside).
__________________
Podwatch: Podcast Reviews: Blog | Podcast

iPhone: 8GB, 1.1.3, Unlocked | MacBook Pro: 2Ghz CoreDuo, 2GB RAM, OS X 10.5.2 | Apple TV: 160GB
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old December 26th, 2005, 10:53 PM
nixgeek's Avatar
Mac of the SubGenius! :-)
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 7,536
Thanks: 13
Thanked 87 Times in 71 Posts
nixgeek has a spectacular aura aboutnixgeek has a spectacular aura aboutnixgeek has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thank The Cheese
bit harsh there barryruger. iPhoto isn't for everyone but I can;t believe it could provoke such hatred. Even if Picasa is better than iPhoto, iPhoto is still a great app in its own right.

I find the people who talk badly about iPhoto are usually those who A) Don't give it a chance; or B) Have a slower system (Admittedly, iPhoto does need an awfully powerful system considering the type of app it is - which is certainly a downside).
I concur.
__________________
Apple iMac G5 17" (2 GHz G5) - Mac OS X 10.4.11
Apple Macintosh Quadra 650 (33 MHz MC68040) - Mac OS 8.1
Apple PowerBook Duo 230 (33 MHz MC68030) - System 7.1
"JHVH-1" (2 GHz AMD Athlon XP 2400+) - Slackware 12.1
"Kidbuntu" (2.8 GHz Celeron D 335) - Ubuntu 8.04
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old December 27th, 2005, 12:12 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 5
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
barryrueger is on a distinguished road
I would have to think that a brand new G4 Powerbook would be fast enough to handle i iPhoto. As for features, I stand by my assessment. Picassa is faster easier and more intuitive than iPhoto.

I have in fact spent several hours with iPhoto and have yet to make it do anything useful. The reason that Picassa is still on my PC is because it just did everything that I wanted - and more - without the slightest effort. It just works!

maybe it will do everything that Picassa will do but if so it sure isn't obvious. That speaks to bad design.

I don't hate iPhoto, I just tire of people who haven't even used Picassa telling me that it's just as good

Last edited by barryrueger; December 27th, 2005 at 12:38 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old January 8th, 2006, 03:53 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
empak is on a distinguished road
I'm just switching from Windows to Mac. I got a Mac Mini and I thought that at least for photos it will be much better then PC. Now I have the problem. I have 10000 photos that I was managing using Picasa since about 3 years. I'm trying to move this to iPhoto but its probably not possible at all.
People who use only iPhoto from the beggining probably don't understand this. They think that it is like it should be. If you look at the list of functions, mayby iPhoto has more (this is what I thought). But to do something with iPhoto I need 10 times more time. I can't accept that after holiday I will spend 10 days putting them inside iPhoto (with picasa it takes 10 minutes).

My only hope is that google will make iPhoto for mac.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
X11 and Programs bobw Unix & X11 4 February 12th, 2003 04:32 PM
Any good graphics programs out there? whitesaint Software Programming & Web Scripting 6 July 29th, 2001 02:00 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:48 PM.


Mac Support® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright 2000-2008 DigitalCrowd, Inc.