|
#33
| |||
| |||
| Quote:
If you want a more fully functional version of OpenOffice, try NeoOffice (http://www.neooffice.org/). I use it mostly for wordprocessing, especially for my resume since it has by default a tighter-lined font (more lines/page than MS Word), plus click one button and your document is printed to PDF - very convenient. I have not used the spreadsheet software very much, though, it doesn't handle Excel spreadsheets with charts well at all - they might have to be recreated inside OOo. Presentation software works pretty well, opens up all PowerPoint slides with formatting issues, but everything is there. I have never used any database features - didn't know any existed. The main advantage of using NeoOffice as opposed to OpenOffice is that NeoOffice is a natively engineered version of OOo written in Java; i.e. it opens much faster on my Dual 2.7 Ghz G5 than the X11 version. I was very skeptical of trying this since I didn't want different versions of OOo floating around on my computer, but after trying it I'm hooked - it loads fast and is stable. Last edited by chemistry_geek; December 25th, 2005 at 10:27 PM. |
|
#34
| |||
| |||
| Appleworks
The Appleworks now available was originally ClarisWorks I believe. Or perhaps that first came out for the Apple IIgs, not sure. The original AppleWorks was written for the Apple II generation. (Showing my age?) As soon as Apple thought they could get by with it they renamed Mac's program AppleWorks. That old AppleWorks (on one floppy) was a wonder. Combined with MacroWorks, I could do most anything with it! I miss its simplicity, and I was unhappy when Apple stole its name back! Todays apps can do a lot, true, but you need more time to learn how to use them than actually use the things! I started with the Apple IIe in 1985. It was a great machine. I eventually moved up to the IIgs which was a bridge for the Mac. Newer printers were coming out which were hard to connect with so I eventually moved over to the PC. But I was so upset with Apple for abandoning the Apple II line that I wouldn't give in to buying a Mac until six years ago on my 70th birthday. I still haven't completely forgiven them, I guess!
|
|
#35
| |||
| |||
|
Since around half my keystrokes go to XEmacs "a highly customizable open source text editor and application development system," that's my primary X11 application (but if you're asking what to use with X11, XEmacs is probably not the place to start...). Ethereal, a network tracer, also takes up a lot of my X11 cycles. |
|
#36
| |||
| |||
| Quote:
|
|
#37
| |||
| |||
| For those Music Geeks...
Ardour is an open source, sequencing music editor... yadda yadda. Does some neat stuff, basically like an open source Cubase LE or some such. Handles a variety of plug-ins. There's info on the site as to how to set these up. There are problems with the automation and some other minute things on the Linux distro, but I haven't had time to run tests on the Mac bin to see if they fixed these or merely translated them right over for us: D You'll need Jack for it to run. I'm using Jack 0.100.1 and JackPilot 1.5.8, which are available, free of course, as a simple click-and-install bundle, or you can compile them yourself if you're bored. Simply open JackPilot, start er up, then double click the Ardour .app which you can get from www.ardour.org. This will open X11 and you'll be ready to go. You'll need to spend some time reading up on the program though... if you don't, you'll spend a lot of time pushing buttons that don't do anything : D cheers -SP |
|
#38
| ||||
| ||||
|
Check out GIMPshop 2.2.11 on Freshmeat <http://osx.freshmeat.net/>. It's a fork of GIMP where the user interface more closely resembles Photoshop.
__________________ phule Apple PowerMac G4 1.25/768/250/Cmbo "Quicksilver" (mirrored-drive) PPC OS X 10.4.11 768 RAM |
|
#39
| |||
| |||
|
Gimp, OpenOffice, xfractint, mrxvt, fontforge, more I like Gimp a lot and it is lot more stable on OS X now than when I initially used it. It keeps getting better. I also got a very good response when I couldn't get an update to compile - good enough that I could compile, though an update including the fix soon followed. (You don't need to compile it yourself - certainly don't try unless you have experience compiling software and want to for some reason.) OpenOffice has improved by leaps and bounds on OS X. I have had much better luck with the X11 version than with NeoOfficeJ and like it a lot better. I don't prepare my own documents in it though - I only use it for dealing with documents from others. Actually, I do produce spreadsheets with it and have been very impressed by its compatibility with Excel. I have quite complex spreadsheets when I have teaching assistants - a master spreadsheet picks up data from per-ta spreadsheets etc. I also automate a lot of the calculations, use charts etc. I've had very few problems sending the tas spreadsheets back and forth whether the tas are using Excel on Mac or PC. I did have one issue, but this was resolved once we figured out exactly which format I needed to export in. xfractint is a port of the DOS programme fractint. It isn't as stable as the DOS version, but it does have a graphical interface. It is one of the oldest fractal programmes. Currently, it compares very favourably with some of the other programmes available in terms of power and flexibility. It is not, however, a good application to begin exploring either fractals or X11 with. I'm still trying to figure it out - it isn't intuitive at all. mrxvt is installed on my Mac (so it is available for Mac now), but I still like Terminal better for most things and I prefer it to iTerm. I run screen instead of using a terminal programme which includes tabs itself. fontforge is a font editor, converter, viewer, creater etc. Very useful if you ever need to convert fonts from one format to another (e.g. to use a font with TeX). I'm not sure by what criteria Apple's X11 is supposed to be better than the alternatives. I would say it depends on what you need to do and what version of OS X you are using. Tiger uses a different version than the previous OSs. Apple's X11 is odd in various ways and still not as stable as I would like. It is also not very up to date. I still use it, but if I needed an application which relied on menus etc. being available in the root window, I might not. I've not had good luck using Apple's X11 in anything but rootless mode. The window manager integrates quite nicely into Mac OS X, but copy/paste isn't as well implemented as it could be (and has been in other implentations). I'm not personally a fan of fink but, on the other hand, it is a long time since I tried it so I expect it has improved drastically in the meantime. Ditto for macports (was darwinports). - cfr |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|