image
image

Go Back   macosx.com > Mac Help Forums > Unix & X11

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #17  
Old February 22nd, 2006, 01:27 PM
pds's Avatar
pds pds is offline
conf User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: On the edge.
Posts: 2,149
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
pds is on a distinguished road
The thread is a bit old - NeoOffice trumps the X11 install.
Try it at planamesa.org
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old February 22nd, 2006, 01:41 PM
fryke's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: macosx.com
Posts: 13,162
Thanks: 2
Thanked 12 Times in 12 Posts
fryke has a spectacular aura aboutfryke has a spectacular aura about
I'm still waiting for the clean OS X port of OOo 2. I'll switch to OOo then. What are we expecting this in now... 2009? 2015?
__________________
MacBook Air 13" 1.6 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 80 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.5
MacBook 13" 1.83 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 160 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.5
Hackintosh Core2Duo 2.4 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 160 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.5
iPhone 3G 16 GB (v2.1), AppleTV 1G 40 GB (v2.1)

Mac user since 1987, Apple Product Professional 2007, 2008.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old February 22nd, 2006, 01:44 PM
nixgeek's Avatar
Mac of the SubGenius! :-)
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 7,551
Thanks: 15
Thanked 88 Times in 72 Posts
nixgeek has a spectacular aura aboutnixgeek has a spectacular aura aboutnixgeek has a spectacular aura about
I had noticed that too. :-p For the record, I've installed the new 2.0 version and it installs fine. It still requires X11 and it's very clunky (tries to bring a Windows-ish environment to the Mac), but it does the job. I haven't tried out NeoOffice yet, but the fact that it's based on the older 1.1.x series is a turn-off for me.
__________________
Apple iMac G5 17" (2 GHz G5) - Mac OS X 10.4.11
Apple Macintosh Quadra 650 (33 MHz MC68040) - Mac OS 8.1
Apple PowerBook Duo 230 (33 MHz MC68030) - System 7.1
"JHVH-1" (2 GHz AMD Athlon XP 2400+) - Slackware 12.1
"Kidbuntu" (2.8 GHz Celeron D 335) - Ubuntu 8.04
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old February 22nd, 2006, 02:49 PM
tomdkat's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 197
Thanks: 6
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
tomdkat is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by nixgeek
I haven't tried out NeoOffice yet, but the fact that it's based on the older 1.1.x series is a turn-off for me.
Yep, that's why I'm pursuing OO 2.0.1 on OS X. I've used OO 2.0 on Windows and it's great.

Peace...
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old February 22nd, 2006, 03:34 PM
fryke's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: macosx.com
Posts: 13,162
Thanks: 2
Thanked 12 Times in 12 Posts
fryke has a spectacular aura aboutfryke has a spectacular aura about
I hate how they install an invisible (starts with a ".") folder to the Applications folder. Makes it a _bit_ hard to get rid of...
__________________
MacBook Air 13" 1.6 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 80 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.5
MacBook 13" 1.83 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 160 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.5
Hackintosh Core2Duo 2.4 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 160 GB HD. Mac OS X 10.5.5
iPhone 3G 16 GB (v2.1), AppleTV 1G 40 GB (v2.1)

Mac user since 1987, Apple Product Professional 2007, 2008.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old February 22nd, 2006, 05:27 PM
tomdkat's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 197
Thanks: 6
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
tomdkat is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by fryke
I hate how they install an invisible (starts with a ".") folder to the Applications folder. Makes it a _bit_ hard to get rid of...
Do you mean the OpenOffice installer creates a hidden folder in the Applications folder? Why would you care if it did or not?

Generally speaking, apps on Unix tend to store local settings in a hidden directory (folder) in the user's home directory (folder) so different users can have different settings even though the app is installed in a central/global location.

Peace...
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old February 25th, 2006, 10:50 PM
tomdkat's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 197
Thanks: 6
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
tomdkat is on a distinguished road
Well, I got OpenOffice 2.0.0 installed on the Mac mini today! Woo-Hoo!!! I haven't done much with it but it seems to run ok. It starts the X server, as mentioned here, and I can easily switch between OO and other OS X apps running, which is great. I was even able to print to a network printer on the first attempt.

Peace...
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old February 26th, 2006, 05:10 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Groton, CT, USA
Posts: 1,291
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
chemistry_geek is on a distinguished road
NeoOffice was recently updated to be functionally equivalent to OpenOffice 2.0. I have both installed on my computer, but use NeoOffice because text/graphics look more Mac-like with anti-aliasing, and it uses the Command key rather than the Control key. Other than those differences, they seem to be functionally identical, except that NeoOffice is a native Mac application and does not require X11.

http://www.neooffice.org/
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:51 PM.


Mac Support® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright 2000-2008 DigitalCrowd, Inc.