Recent content by pns6430

Funny thing is he/she was slamming me for dredging up an old thread, it is the top of the list on google and I really have wanted to post on here for some time. I have just been to busy. Regards Phil

Like I said, I posted originally to head off anyone considering using Helix. Helix doesn't work as the QSA Toolworks site suggests that it does, not even close. A new user could not even build a database in Helix unless they could run Classic, that fact is buried deep in the long winded...

Randy, Do you ever admit you were wrong? Wow, you slam appleworks but support Helix. What would anyone else call a software package that will not run on hardware that isn't at least 5 years old. I guess we will have to agree to disagree, but your definition of usable software is suspect...

Randy, Let me be clear, I have no "Axe to grind", what I do have is nearly two decades of development with a software package that despite repeated promises by it's owners continues to be, frankly, a big disappointment. Your continued proclamation of Helix's new release as a sign of it's...

Here is a quote from qsa tool works's own site "We’ve always recommended that if your Mac can run Classic (and if you’ve got a PowerPC Mac, it can) then you should run the Classic Helix products. OS X Helix is required to run on an Intel Mac, but not on PowerPC." I have used helix for 17...

Filemaker while frustration for advanced development would be ideal. Regards Phil

I know this was posted some time ago but one thing needs to be corrected, Helix is basically dead. It won't run on OS10 in the development environment, so you would need to have a classic compatible machine. Even though the server and client "run" in OS10 they are not stable or reliable. I have...