Search results

WOOOOOOHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!! A bit late, but ain't it great!!! :D :D :D :D :D

And about Macrumors: I only use the site as a starting point in getting my information. But the thing I like about Macrumors is that the site administrators do apply a certain amount of scrutiny to any news and rumors that do come out, while at the same they give positive feedback to anything...

Please read my reply in the other forum concerning your assumptions. Yes, a G4 may fulfill my needs for a short time, but a G5 will bring me much more longevity. :D

Zammy-Sam, you make way too many incorrect assumptions. I did NOT spend two years in this forum doing research. In fact, I've only posted here on rare occasions in the past two years or so and only to give advice to Apple in this 'Opinions, Reviews and Open Letters' forum. :p The site...

No, there is one reason why I can't do that: The superiority of Mac OS X over Microsucks Winblows!!! ::evil::

Weak? I'm the one that's being neutral and you guys are the one's that are biased. :p

Ha ha ha. You still think I'm biased in basing my decision on game performance. Get real. The Mac I plan to buy will be used to develop video game multimedia, but a PC will still be used to develop the code and play them. ::ha::

You truly are a typical Machead, biased in everything you have to say about Macs. ::alien::

No. Affordable to me would have be a G5 iMac, which knowing Apple it should come in at a modest midrange computer price.

Yep, especially when I have no Macintosh to test with. :p

No, I looked at benchmarks from trusted Internet sources.

It matters not how well they run. The numbers do matter because you are only referring to performance of specific applications, while I am talking about overall system performance with ANY application. What are you trying to do anyway? Get me to consider buying a G3 or G4 system? It's not...

No, my research was NOT ENTIRELY focused on games. My research was as broad as it gets and very little of it was actually focused on games.

Click Here

Thank God I actually do look at the numbers and too many Macheads just don't understand that not everything Apple tells them about it's products is necessarily true. They often greatly exaggerate what their products can do just to make it sound good when they market them. ::alien::

I've spent two years doing the research already. I know what I'm talking about.

Oh, it was that high on Apple's website. Are you sure you're looking at a catalog dated around May-June 2003? Are you sure you're looking at a catalog with prices in U.S. dollars?

$3,799? That price was for the high-end DP 1.42 GHz PowerMac, just before the PowerMac G5 was released and it was in American dollars.

HA HA HA HA!!! A 1 GHz G4 outperforming a P4 3.2 HT!!! HA HA HA HA!!! LOL!!! ROTFL!!! YEAH, RIGHT!!! I ALREADY KNOW BETTER THAN TO BELIEVE THAT SILLINESS!!! :p

It's an 800MHz bus; not 200MHz. And I don't think that average PC users care much about BIOSes. Heck, many know nothing about it or even what it's for.