Search results

Zesty, I used to think that Apple did a fantastic job until I started poking around on the message boards, newsgroups, and managed to get 5 minutes to play with OS-X beta.... Please someone win me back, I realy hurts me to have to say things, such critical things, about something I liked so...

hatoni: Your statement is right on - but it *IS* also the problem.. MacOS users have never had to have things carefully explained to them.... There's a really serious problem here and I'm deeply concerned for those users who have invested so heavily in Apple's products..... Personally, I like...

I am curious if anyone has tried and/or succeeded in getting Postgres to work with OS-X?... Obviously MySQL has some *serious* problems for any real database sort-of work (which, respectfully do not seem to be apriority for the MySQL folks for some really strange reason..)... It would be...

That's what it should be and I totally agree with you - nothing interests me more then being able to get at the command line of OS-X... I love UNIX and I always will.... I just hope that Apple is getting the point that we both see so clearly.... OS-X needs to be another MacOS upgrade to...

> :eek: Wow there, that's not the way you're supposed to do > that. If you want to turn off those services as they are > called, simply open the /etc/hostconfig file and replace > -YES- with -NO- on the service you don't want to use. > Then they will not be loaded on startup. > Only shutdown...

Hello, Actually I am glad that people are discussing this, but it raises a HUGE issue with me.... First of all, I'm a UNIX systems integrator, but I love the Macintosh interface.... It troubles me *tremendously* that Macintosh users are going to have to contend with the UNIX shells, etc...