Search results

AHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH *urk* *breath* *urk* *breath*...

At my work they have Windows 2000 machines (how come there wasn't an option for that in the poll? I just checked NT) and old VMS machines to run hardware equipment (yes, they are ten years old, made by Digital, a company bought by Compaq). I can't stand that. So I bring an iBook to work...

Meh. I'm turned off by people who can't stand life without a multi-button mouse, and insult one-button mice just because they need all those extraneous buttons. I've seen better reviews than this one. But whatever, it's OK, I guess.

At the bottom of the ThinkSecret article it still says they are unsure whether Apple will charge for existing services or not. Hopefully they don't.

And there's a reason why IE and OmniWeb choose to allow frame tags inside body tags. Because it allows for more flexibility and less problems. That's just the way it works....... in Netscape/Mozilla. Obviously it's fine for FRAME tags to be inside BODY tags in IE/Omniweb. Yes, I did...

Riiiight. One simple thing like that will lead to chaos. How in the world could allowing such simple things like that lead to chaos? It would be very beneficial to allow things like this. Obviously it doesn't hurt anything, otherwise IE and OmniWeb would be throwing a fit, wouldn't they...

Coming from the perspective of a web developer, I don't understand some of these comments. goynang: No, actually, I think it's wrong that Mozilla/Netscape don't allow that. Give me ONE VALID REASON why it's wrong to do that, besides the "reason" that Netscape/Mozilla are so strict about...

xoot: That article was referring to fixes in Mac OS X 10.1, which has nothing to do with the current security update. Furthermore, I doubt that *Microsoft* would ever help out Apple with :rolleyes: *security*, when methinks it has a major security problem in Windows as it is. Anyway, I...

It seems to me that my code is up to "standards". But I'm not exactly sure as I've not really been a website creator up until lately. In any case, it's still very annoying to have to support Netscape/Mozilla as they are very picky browsers. One small thing makes a whole page not display...

I have been working on developing a web page for about 3 weeks now, and I have come to the realization about why Netscape/Mozilla doesn't dominate the web browser market. I can sum it up in two words: "they suck". If you want to say I'm starting another browser war here, fine. But I am...

Meh. I still MUCH prefer Flurry.saver. I'm too lazy to post the link, but it's on VersionTracker, I'm sure.

Pff.. are you guys kidding? If you saw the original movie, the creator (whether it's our dear ksv or not ;) ) picked up the Palm device, turned it around, and showed it booting up. You could CLEARLY see there were no cables extending from the Palm device. It was an obvious prototype. Of...

OK, OK, OK. "drivers"? Yes, that is a Mac term. Drivers are things that allow third-party peripherals to work with a Mac (or any computer for that matter). You get drivers for your CD burner, FireWire hard drive, mouse (yes, mice too), etc. But "wallpaper"..? Excuse me, but if I hear...

I just figured it out and updated my last post. It's because I'm using the "-w" operator. :D