Search results

transmit does exactly this, and wonderfully simple. it is shareware, but not too expensive, and you might even use it for a limited time when you trial has gone overdue.. do a search on versiontracker.com for transmit, and you'll find it. ale.x

don't know, really, but what about asking your retailer(was it the apple-store??) about why it didn't come qith an invoice...? explain the matter, and explain that it didn't really cross your mind before now because of this and that you know.. ask if they can make you one, just with the old...

i've always had the shop were i bought my stuff take care of any problems.. don't know what you should do if you ordered online trough the uk apple-store, but if you did buy it in a shop, go there and have them take care of whatever's wrong.. on a sidenote; if there was no invoice provided, i...

thanks alot, bob, that did the trick..

chevy; so what you're saying is that the new apple displays only have new design and "new" electronics to them? performance wise, are the old and new displays pretty much the same??? alex.

hi, can anyone point me in the direction of a manual/howto of how to install additional memory on my G3 iBook? been searching around at apple, but they only seem to have a manual for the G4, wich is slightly different from my G3. doing a search at theese forums yielded in results, but none...

is there no work-around to get split screens on the iMac? like Screen Spanning Doctor(or likewise) for the iBooks...? i mean, mirrored mode is fine, but hell, my life was finally worth living again when i could work with double screens ;) alex.

no worries. if you have any more questions, don't hesitate to ask.. my email is in my profile! (i even speak german if you want ;) ) alex.

i bought the in-ears some months ago, due to problem with my ears and normal ear-buds. they just don't fit togheter. a little twitch and they fall out.. but i got BIG ISSUES with the in-ears aswell! i liked how they fit in the ear, they did exactly what i expected fittingswise.. i got...

well, normally, if i watch it on the display it is allright.. but remember that is a 12"-display, so i always just figured my video-card was just about strong enough to give me a decent picture on that, but wasn't capable of blowing things up.. the screen will be kinda blurry whatever i do, for...

i have a question somewhat related to this(i don't mean to steal your tread, rdennison, but i think zammy's answer is what you're lokking for..): when i connect my iBook to my TV everything is all too pixel pixel pixel. i mean, if a want to watch a movie, the darker colours are very...

are you sure you are dragging the proper file? i mean, if you're downloading applicatins they are likely to come either as a .dmg file or a .sit-file. depending on what you got you do the following; if your download appears as a disc on your desktop, open the disc-image in finder and then...

two ports, yes. my guess is that they are both ADC, though, so you might have to get one of those adapters anyway, but the card is already pre-equipped with two 'out's.. .a

nobody knows yet when tiger will be released, rumours say first half or first quarter of 2005. as for if the include it right away, i would say yes, afterall it is released, so the natural thing would be to include it at once. no reason fro waiting. maybe some other have experience from the...

in danger of quoting myself; waaaaay too much money ;) alex.

i know what you mean - i saw the 30-inch for the first time in a store today, but wondered several minutes if this really was the 30" or the 23".. finally figured it was the 30", but i imagined it ALOT bigger.. and now, the 23" i was really planning on getting seems like somewhat a waste...

do a search on safari vs firefox, and you'll find exactly what you're looking for, just a couple of weeks back.. alex.

no. no other issues that i know about. but this has been an issue with since i started using mail a couple of months back, it just recently really started to annoy me. thats why i adressed it now.. alex.

well.., thunderbird shows equally corrupted messages, so it seems to be my machine somewhat. in thunderbird, though, the mail creates those standard cracked image-icons, like those you would see if any site would display pictures that had been given a wrong path.. but i don't believe this...

howcome 90% of the mails i get, written in html, fail to show as intented in Mail? ok, so maybe a fair 80% is spam, but some are actually mails/commercial from lists i've signed up to myself. i will enclose a picture, but it mainly just shows up as purple square-sized icons, where i reckon...