Search results

This is bad. While I use a Mac and Logic Gold myself, I am saddened by this. A less heterogenic sequencer market will be the result, which is catastrophic, since the next largest one is Cubase, which is, in my opinion, not very good. What a loss for Windows users (Emagic have been forced (of...

Hi. I am looking for a fairly good-looking OpenGL 3D game demo for OS X, perhaps Quake III (I couldn't find this). Are there any availible?

Hi. I am looking for either a plug-in for software like MACAST or MacAmp which can control the speed of audio, and not modify the pitch, or, alternatively, a stand-alone program for this. I know such a plug-in exists for WinAmp, and I'm sure there is one for Mac OS (classic).

There was no signal noise on the old G3. It picked up frequencies good enough... But if I want multiple inputs, there aren't really any other options than semi- or professional cards.

Hm... I'm not sure. I am going to be using this machine for semi-professional hard disk recording, and that iMic thing looks suspicious. And I really don't like USB. Is it fast enough for audio transfers? I guess it is for just a stereo input... However, I might go for a card with 4...

Hi! Could someone tell me if it is true that the Power Mac G4 "QuickSilver" line has no Audio line/microphone input? What is the reasoning behind this if it is true? Further, are there any ways around this (CD connector on sound card, et cetera?). Finally, as all I do with the Macintosh...

MUAHAHA APPLE MUAHAHA

Stupid, ugly and dumb RacerX person. It's not called "X-Windows". You can't pretend that it is some fast racing car that you can fantasize about playing around in. Either of these alternatives are acceptable: "X", "X Window System", "X Version 11", "X Window System, Version 11", "X11"...

It's x86. Valve would have to port it, and they won't.

Here's a post of pity. (for people shouting Oh My Fucking God for being able to play a DVD at acceptable speed)

Soapvox, "XWindows" (as you called it. it is really X Window System, X11 et cetera) is not a desktop manager. it is a windowing system. the most common consumer implementation of this is XFree86. on top of that you run a window manager, which could be twm, enlightenment, et cetera. desktop...

Ha ha, I used to have some faith in Mac users, but in the end, they are all idiots. This thread clearly demonstrates it.

Matrix Agent: No, I'm completely new here. And I feel very comfortable using words that might be offensive to most people. It's a topic I feel strongly about. It's a topic of extreme importance, and user experience is extremely irrelevant.

No. 1) OS X is PPC 2) Native OS X applications use the OS X UI/graphical APIs (Aqua et al), which are not present in Darwin/AfterStep

natis wrote: If you care the least bit about standards, you'd know that Mozilla (Netscape 6) is unparalleled when it comes to standards! This is really the only valid concern in these times!!! A browser like Mozilla is indeed fast and responsive enough, given today's computer speeds...

When you post it on that iDisk thing, you shut out users of other operating systems.

"Matrix Agent" wrote: That is quite a idiotic thing to say. The only desirable thing is a browser that has the features of Mozilla. Everything is irrelevant and will spell the death of the open internet.