Search results

Also, not to forget that the Revolution system will probably sell for much less money than Apple can ever sell the Mac Mini for, which means that it would be cheaper to just buy a Revolution to play Gamecube games than to buy a Mac to play Gamecube games. This obviously wouldn't help Apple sell...

I don't think Nintendo would ever allow this. As you may not have already heard, Nintendo recently announced that their next system, Revolution, will be backwards compatible with Gamecube games, so making Gamecube games compatible with the Mac would undermine Nintendo's ability to sell...

Save the best for last. Lion should be used for version 10.9. :) The Sabertooth is extinct so even though it's a cool sounding name I don't think it'll work for OS X. ::alien::

I second that. :p

Nah. There's no excuse for Apple to be shy when it comes to marketing Mac OS X. :p

#1 No TV Advertising of Mac OS X #2 No TV Advertising of Mac OS X #3 No TV Advertising of Mac OS X #4 Not Enough TV Advertising #5 Not Enough TV Advertising Go figure. :p

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,156407,00.html There is also a video on the Fox News site if you care to watch it. ;)

LOL :p :D

Speaking of which, making Mac-only games that look and sound GREAT even on low-end systems like the Mac Mini and the eMac just might get many PC users to realize the AWESOME performance of the Mac and will allow them justifying buying a cheaper low-end Mac, while prosumers and creative...

You do realize that if Apple began working with third-party game developers to develop games ONLY for the Mac that it would increase the VALUE of the Mac platform. The PC platform already has many games that can only be played on it, so it's only fair. Think about it. :)

Link Boy, I certainly hope this rumor is true. Apple, if you are not even the slightest bit considering such a move then I still think you should just do it anyway. Reason being is that this would be a brilliant way to bring more PC users to the Mac platform. Apple, what I would do in this...

http://www.macrumors.com/pages/2005/01/20050114041111.shtml Ok, so if the above rumor is true then here's an idea: Apple: When the Powerbooks and iBooks finally get G5 processors I think it would be wise of you to introduce a very-low cost G4 notebook akin to the Mac Mini. So then, PC...

It's a metaphor. "One foot in a Mac user's shoe" gives you the ability to see things from a Mac user's point-of-view. The "other foot in a PC user's shoe" gives you the ability to see things from a PC user's point-of-view. ::love::

Of course it doesn't make sense. That's because you're a machead. ::alien::

You know, I can see where this is going. It is going towards an endless loop that will keep going on and on until this thread is closed. Your posts have absolutely no value whatsoever. If you want to post, you should post something meaningful instead rabbling on and on with such stupidity and...

~!@#$%^&*()_{}|:"<>? I didn't argue that it wasn't a computer. I said that it is not a full-fledged PC (like a desktop or a notebook). DUH GEORGE!!!

Chevy, get out that machead of yours. Take one foot out of that Mac user's shoe and put it in a PC user's shoe; leave the other foot where it's at. Stop thinking 100% Mac; instead think 50% Mac, 50% PC. Ok, now go ahead and argue a point. . .

LOL!!! Ok, this is just funny. LOL!!!

LOL!!! The iPod is not a full-fledged PC. :p

Tell you what. . . Put one foot in a Mac user's shoe and the other foot in a PC user's shoe, then try to argue your point. FWIW, Apple doesn't have a choice, but to do cheap if they want to get millions upon millions of potential switchers to switch.