Apple Shutting Down old Imac line.

Sirtovin

Senior Switcher Tech Guru
http://msnbc.com/news/887105.asp?0si=-
My source

March 18 — Five years after debuting the original iMac, Apple Computer has stopped selling the gumdrop-shaped machine to the public. The original iMac, which many credit for restoring Apple Computer to fiscal health and profitability, has been on its last legs for some time, though Apple continued to sell it even after debuting the flat-panel iMac in January 2002 and later the eMac.
BUILT AROUND A 15-inch CRT (cathode-ray tube), the original iMac debuted in 1998 for $1,299. The computer eventually sold for as little as $799, keeping its trademark design virtually unchanged while adding features like FireWire, CD burners and DVD players.
However, on Tuesday, Apple removed the lone CRT-based iMac from Apple’s main online store, and a source confirmed that Apple does not plan to keep selling it publicly. The machine is still listed on Apple’s online education store and schools have been the main reason Apple has continued to make the device.
Introduced in a shade known as Bondi Blue, the iMac spent its childhood in candy colors like grape and lime and its early adulthood in wild hues like Blue Dalmatian and Flower Power before spending its later years in subtle shades like graphite and snow.
Within hours after its disappearance from the Apple Store, the iMac was being eulogized by the Mac faithful.
At MacWhispers, the site’s operator notes that he bought the original iMac in 1998 for his office, later giving the machine to his wife and then to his 12-year-old niece.
“She’s still using it to surf the Web and to do her homework in 2003,” he said.
IDC analyst Roger Kay praised the iMac for helping keep Apple afloat.
AdvertisementClick Here!



“It was like an all-time home run product, but obviously it had run its course,” Kay said, adding that the advent of affordable flat-panel monitors necessitated the demise of the iMac.
Kay said that at the time of the original iMac’s introduction, the idea of an all-in-one computer becoming a mainstream success was an odd one, but Apple made it work, selling millions of the machines. From 1998 through 2001, it was the iMac that kept Apple among the leading computer makers.
“It meant that they were able to maintain share instead of stumbling along or going out of business,” Kay said. “Without the iMac, they would have gone into a nose dive.”
The iMac continued to serve as Apple’s product for entry-level computer buyers. With its demise, Apple’s cheapest computer for most customers is the $999 eMac, a model styled along the lines of the original iMac but built around a 17-inch monitor.
Tools and Toys
• RIAA warns companies on piracy
• Satellite radio made easy
• New wireless phone targets youth
However, Kay said Apple doesn’t necessarily need to introduce a cheaper product. He said Apple doesn’t even need to maintain share to stay healthy, as long as its costs are in line with its sales and it is able to offer a product that is perceived as a good value.
“That’s OK as long as what you get for that $1,000 is as good or better than what you get” from competitors, Kay said. “I don’t think they need to go lower.”

Copyright © 1995-2003 CNET Networks, Inc. All rights reserved

Um delete this post if it did violate copyright laws etc.
 
It's fine, since you cited the source. :)

I still use my iMac at home, however it's getting old and slow and will need replacing soon. It's under the minimum recommendations for most programs now. :\
 
Originally posted by Ricky
It's fine, since you cited the source. :)

I still use my iMac at home, however it's getting old and slow and will need replacing soon. It's under the minimum recommendations for most programs now. :\

vroom, vroom go for a PowerMac. :)
 
I love my nifty little iMac (Francessca). She has served me well. I am in the mood to upgrade to a Powerbook but even afterwards I will still be putting this little beauty to work :D
 
I am with you on that one. I want a powerbook or IBook but I'll never get rid of my iMac, it's such a solid workhorse and has followed me from one end of the country and back lived with me on my boat, taken my abuse and it just keeps on ticking without a single problem Ok, well, as I've said before OS9.01 did not like it at all, but that was long ago.
 
Originally posted by Ugg
If it's a Mac, then it's all good!
Not necessarily...

They're still Macs, but would you like to be stuck on a Quadra or a Performa for life's everyday demanding uses? Yes, Macs can get 5 years or more of life without needing replacement (unlike PC's), but eventually all computers become obsolete to the point of nostalgia.

The G3 I'm on right now is 5 years old (it's beige, for Pete's sake) and it's just now starting to show its age. True, I haven't been able to play the latest greatest games on it for a couple years, but only recently have we run into major problems like temperamental SCSI drives, an overly selective CD-ROM drive, etc. Right now it's an Internet-only machine, but it's capable of much more, including Photoshop 7 (which is on the offline drive).
 
...I think the problem with the iMac G3 isn't what it can or cannot do anymore for us but in what price?

I think if Apple would lower the price around $300-$400 the iMac could sell some more even for users who need/want a Mac to run Classic or even Linux... ;)

And yes, with 512MB of RAM it runs the X just fine for basic stuff! :D

I think Apple wanted this Mac to RIP just because it ain't G4 :rolleyes:

Could the new G970 based Macs be just around the corner? :cool:
 
...I think the problem with the iMac G3 isn't what it can or cannot do anymore for us but in what price?

I think if Apple would lower the price around $300-$400 the iMac could sell some more even for users who need/want a Mac to run Classic or even Linux... ;)

And yes, with 512MB of RAM it runs the X just fine for basic stuff! :D

I think Apple wanted this Mac to RIP just because it ain't G4 :rolleyes:

Could the new G970 based Macs be just around the corner? :cool:
 
Originally posted by arden
Would you like to be stuck on a Quadra or a Performa for life's everyday demanding uses? Yes, Macs can get 5 years or more of life without needing replacement (unlike PC's), but eventually all computers become obsolete to the point of nostalgia.


Depends on what your life's everyday uses are.

All my father knows from computers can be summed up in 2 points:

1) "Hey, this big thingy is real better than my Brother typewriter !"

2) "Oh, and email is so much cheaper than sending snailmail !"

So he's got email at work and works on Word 98 on the Performa which was mine before. He's very happy like that, isn't it cute :D

God, you should have seen his puzzled face when he discovered the Backspace key. Instant correction ! He had used typewriters so much before he could not believe it.

Note I've been using this Performa until end of year 2001 :rolleyes:. Okay, I learnt about Unreal Tournament long after it was released, but apart from games I could still use some little jewels of the time (PS6, AI9...).
 
And think, someday people (maybe some of us) are going to wax lyrical about the dual 1.42 ghz Power Mac G4 and how it was great in its day, but has been showing its teeth lately and can barely meet minimum requirements for most apps these days. ... *sigh* :eek:
 
Yeah, watching parents using computers is pretty funny. My dad is 69 and he sent his first email a couple of years ago. It took him forever because he never had much use for a typewriter and had to hunt for every letter. He is still confused about who "owns" the internet!

If and when I become a big movie maker (ha, ha) I'll need a faster processor, but this one does just fine for everything I need it for. I can see it lasting me another couple of years easily.

I wonder what the percentage of macs still being used is in comparison to pcs?
 
Back
Top