Okay, let's dive head-on into the new Apple News heap, shall we? What kind of nifty Bluetooth Apple-branded device is being developed by those Cupertino engineers and industrial designers?
Anyone? Bueller? Bueller?
Oh, and do you think any of it will be unveiled at MWNY?
I mean, c'mon, this isn't like supporting USB years ago where there wasn't this opportunity to take a technological edge because that dealt only with computer peripherals. This is an opportunity to delve into communications devices. Heck, this fits into Apple's mode of developing something new and nifty to fit rather nicely in the digital hub scheme. Look at what they've done with Firewire and the iPod.
There was no big, profitable reason for Apple needed to show support for Bluetooth unless they see an opportunity to expand in that direction. As far as I understand, with Bluetooth you can communicate with printers, other computers and other cell phones, blah, blah, blah.
But what can Apple possibly make that requires very low bandwidth and at a short distance? Or is this an argument against the possibility of a new Apple-Branded Bluetooth device?
C'mon, people, I want some creative answers here! (Geez, I sound like my high school english teacher...)
Anyone? Bueller? Bueller?
Oh, and do you think any of it will be unveiled at MWNY?
I mean, c'mon, this isn't like supporting USB years ago where there wasn't this opportunity to take a technological edge because that dealt only with computer peripherals. This is an opportunity to delve into communications devices. Heck, this fits into Apple's mode of developing something new and nifty to fit rather nicely in the digital hub scheme. Look at what they've done with Firewire and the iPod.
There was no big, profitable reason for Apple needed to show support for Bluetooth unless they see an opportunity to expand in that direction. As far as I understand, with Bluetooth you can communicate with printers, other computers and other cell phones, blah, blah, blah.
But what can Apple possibly make that requires very low bandwidth and at a short distance? Or is this an argument against the possibility of a new Apple-Branded Bluetooth device?
C'mon, people, I want some creative answers here! (Geez, I sound like my high school english teacher...)