Parallels is awesome! :D

Then again, after looking at the pix, they merely show several versions of Windows (2.0.x through Win2K without NT 4, as far as I can see) in a Parallels window. Nothing really fancy there. Well: The Win 2.0.x is nice. As in "ugly", I mean. :)
 
oh sorry, didn't know registration was required to view the attatchments...here they are attatched to this thread :)

EDIT: Weird...the manage attatchments window doesn't seem to be working as the images won't upload (and there's no error that I can see either :-/)...here they are uploaded at imageshack...

http://img234.imageshack.us/img234/1345/win2kaz5.jpg

http://img118.imageshack.us/img118/3927/win95ok4.jpg

http://img110.imageshack.us/img110/4364/win98te8.jpg

http://img352.imageshack.us/img352/3944/windows2op9.jpg

http://img352.imageshack.us/img352/4008/windows311ld8.jpg

http://img69.imageshack.us/img69/807/winntld8.jpg
 
Then again, after looking at the pix, they merely show several versions of Windows (2.0.x through Win2K without NT 4, as far as I can see) in a Parallels window. Nothing really fancy there. Well: The Win 2.0.x is nice. As in "ugly", I mean. :)
well the point is to show how parallels can support a wide array of OSes, not just todays XP ;) :)
 
well the point is to show how parallels can support a wide array of OSes, not just todays XP ;) :)

Well, VMWare has been able to do this forever now and they should have a Mac version of VMWare available for Intel Macs only (which sucks, but so be it :rolleyes:). VirtualPC and Q/QEMU can also do this, albeit slowly. :p

Now, if you ran Windows on Parallels and then in the Windows environment have VMware running Linux and then from within the Linux VM have QEMU running another x86 operating system..... ;)
 
Well: We don't have to wait for VMware to _finally_ come around, since Parallels has nailed virtualization for the Mac in my opinion. It's been working with various OSs for quite some time now. Good stuff, so I understand hexstar's happiness about it very well. It's just not _news_ anymore exactly. ;)
 
lol 1) that'd take a whole lotta space 2) that'd take a lot more ram then anyone these days reasonably have....but hey if you have the resources to do that I too would love to see that :p :D ...but then again maybe someday I'll decide to tackle that for fun...
 
Well: We don't have to wait for VMware to _finally_ come around, since Parallels has nailed virtualization for the Mac in my opinion. It's been working with various OSs for quite some time now. Good stuff, so I understand hexstar's happiness about it very well. It's just not _news_ anymore exactly. ;)

Yeah, I'm not holding my breath on VMWare for the Mac, but it's another option. For now, Parallels is great and probably will continue to be so.
 
Back
Top