twyg
Back to Mac Baby!
http://securitytracker.com/alerts/2002/Jan/1003326.html
Looks like our friends at Microsoft have as usual made their product so sprawling that it was easy that something like this could pass through the cracks. I would imagine that if AppleScripts could be started, why not other things? (With a little tweaking of course)
I realize the work and complexities of programming something the size, and capability of Internet Explorer. I also know that when a program and it's developers are managed well, and QA is heavily monitored things like this don't happen. Why on earth would someone want to run a file on a users machine. Mind you, the question is not "why would you" but definitely should be "why can they?" Privacy buffs, have at it...
Imagine the damage that could be caused. Let's now rejoice in the fact that 99.9% of the mac users we know aren't malicious enough to do real damage, just for the simple reason that it isn't a nice thing to do.
Most PC hackers wouldn't be able to do much damage either. You know why? AppleScript is far to simple, they would get thrown off by looking for "the real code".
note: This all applies to the OS 9 version, as stated in the link text. But if it's in the 9 version, then what was missed in 10?
Looks like our friends at Microsoft have as usual made their product so sprawling that it was easy that something like this could pass through the cracks. I would imagine that if AppleScripts could be started, why not other things? (With a little tweaking of course)
I realize the work and complexities of programming something the size, and capability of Internet Explorer. I also know that when a program and it's developers are managed well, and QA is heavily monitored things like this don't happen. Why on earth would someone want to run a file on a users machine. Mind you, the question is not "why would you" but definitely should be "why can they?" Privacy buffs, have at it...
Imagine the damage that could be caused. Let's now rejoice in the fact that 99.9% of the mac users we know aren't malicious enough to do real damage, just for the simple reason that it isn't a nice thing to do.
Most PC hackers wouldn't be able to do much damage either. You know why? AppleScript is far to simple, they would get thrown off by looking for "the real code".
note: This all applies to the OS 9 version, as stated in the link text. But if it's in the 9 version, then what was missed in 10?