Search results

  1. K

    my stance for macs.

    I'm not a X-Windows developer nor I use Linux on my desktop. But I would like to. I simply can't because of my work, as explained on a previous reply. Yes. Linux, specifically Red Hat, DO have administrative tools on the X environment. Graphical tools. I take you are a very good sysadmin...
  2. K

    my stance for macs.

    I don't suppose you read my other replies. I hate Windows. But is something that I have to use because of my work. I develop for the web and there are no good tools for Linux. I'd rather run Linux on all my computers, but I simply can't. Sometimes I have to connect to a M$ SQL server, and they...
  3. K

    my stance for macs.

    Read RacerX's first reply. He claims that there are other companies that do the same thing, and I have to agree. It didn't come to my mind when I replied to you, but those companies DO offer hardware and software on their own. So who's right? Wait! Did Apple develop NextStep? I though it was...
  4. K

    my stance for macs.

    Any computer can crash. That's due to how computers work. My Windows doesn't crash very often either. I run Windows 2000 and I know that 98/ME is just crappy. I'm not saying that 2000 is perfect, but is alot better than 98/ME. Solrac used to have major problems with a G4 (OS 9)before, just as I...
  5. K

    my stance for macs.

    Agreed. As I said on the beginning, I'm NOT defending M$ and it's products. That's why I run Linux on my servers. Everybody knows that Real is a poor excuse for a streamming solution. At least anyone that ever had to deal with it. You can't expect M$ to be good either. Quicktime just rules...
  6. K

    my stance for macs.

    So they can't make money without keeping the GUI? How come Red Hat makes money then? Hmmm ... sounds like M$. Nah beyotch. I'm not talking about command line commands. I'm talking about actual software. Go look at FreshMeat or SourceForge for example. Now the fact that OS X runs the...
  7. K

    my stance for macs.

    OMFG !!! I actually clicked on this guy's website link. It's SOO KOO! Specially because he talks about giraffes. Too bad it wasn't flying giraffes, but we, eNoLa, are the experts on the flying giraffe business. If you would like to talk more about FG's, please email sam eNoLa.
  8. K

    my stance for macs.

    I still have my head in perfect condition (if you call this perfect). And I'm ready for more ! bring it on Solrac !!!
  9. K

    my stance for macs.

    Agreed. Hell yeah! That WOULD be cool, but it can't be because Apple is an egoist beyotch. And that IS necessary. What's the only thing that prevents mass acceptance of other *nix flavors? The GUI. From the end user point of view, of course. See beyotch? They don't seem to care about...
  10. K

    my stance for macs.

    FYI, *nix uses shared libraries just like Windows do. And they do conflict. I've encountered several problems with this. Sometimes you need to upgrade a shared library and it breaks another program. Apple IS taking away from the community because it's using a *nix kernel, it developed a cool...
  11. K

    my stance for macs.

    Before I start talking again, I just want to clarify that I'm not, BY NO MEANS, defending Windows! I hate Windows just as much as anyone that uses it. I just think that the whole "Mac is the best thing in the world" is bs. Mac users are know for that. Windows XP does have better memory...
Back
Top