Search results

but i love macosx.. just hate intel.. c'mon i really meant OS X on Cell

look i dont care about G4's or G5's i care about Cell.

No you are wrong. But it is to be blamed for windows' slowness... AMD was much better in (x86) chip development.

It's not like "we" have a choice... :mad:

ehm... http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2005/jun/06intel.html isin't that a good enough hint that they are moving to intel processors... gee.

hahaah ... macs have lost my respect, since they have lost their uniqueness. Death to the x86 arch! Like we have a damn choice. Watch as all developers now create more x86 apps vs. ppc apps. haa... Brilliant move apple. You just killed ppc. At the least they could have moved to Cell.

heck, this is the end of the ppc arch. who's gonna buy a mac when its available on x86 eh? and x86s are dirt cheap and fast. damn it.. i really hoped that apple would have opted for Cell.

Apple is too stupid to not move to Cell... (bastards.. think!!!) NOTE: Cell is PowerPC based and has crossed 3ghz *sigh* this is sooo disappointing

i vote for cell... i have my hopes on it. (theoretically its supposed to be able to break the 4.x ghz barrier)

the latter.. but if u want actual chip performance... wait for PS3

wow if apple were to do such a "stupid move".. argh! that would be soo dissapointing.. i think i'd switch to linux and never touch a mac ever again. I mean if apple were to switch processors.. it should be "Cell" not intel... its just plain stupid.. Cell if by far more superior and is powerpc...

Ruby. Its the best to learn.

yea i agree, its just as easy to learn Darwin than it is to learn FreeBSD or Linux.

SAX parsers are quite simple.. Apache Xerces conforms to SAX.. if you only use it as a sax-based parser, it would simplify things a lot.

Apple is becomming more like Microsoft. ugh! I mean releasing unpolished software to the general public and then expecting people to patch it up.. pfft. It's like those Service Pack releases for windows. Although those SP releases are majorly security issues :p.. you know but still.. i hate...

well... apple says: Important: Please read before installing You may experience unexpected results if you have installed third-party system software modifications, or if you have modified the operating system through other means. (This does not apply to normal application software...

give me a break.. please dont even try to compare Qt to Cocoa.. Cocoa is far superior.. as of Tiger you can create a full fledge Word processor without writing any code. pfft. Cocoa's simplicity is just outstanding. It is by for the most productive GUI application API I've come across. PS...

depends.. if its the new J2SE 5.0 they are right.. else. no. edit: but you say OS 9? well i doubt OS 9 has even 1.4...

Yes, i'm not a big fan of categories either, a good design will eliminate their use. But at times its best you dont extend classes to add functionality, specially when it's of a foreign library or collection, i.e it's not created by you. In these cases catagories are very handy. And I suggest...

Lets say you need to extend the functionality of the already present NSString class. Dont simply create a new sub-class (unless you really need to define a new sub-type) use catagories instead. I'd say, when ever you think there's a parent-child relationship that needs to be implemented, use...