djubelirer
Registered
My uses:
Only use OS X 10.1 (never use OS 9)
Never do heavy 3D Rendering or Animation (use the computer for research on the internet and writing papers, MP3, burning, photos, etc)
Now, since I am only using OS X 10.1, would the Dual 800 be like a 1.6ghz G4 in all programs, and be significantly faster all of the time?
Would the Dual 800 last much longer in terms of being outdated?
So, is the Dual 800 worth the price increase when you are only using OS X, and this computer is not solely for graphics rendering etc??
Thanks for the help...it is greatly appreciated.
I posted something earlier, but I forgot to clarify the only using OS X 10.1 part, which is extremely important.
David
Only use OS X 10.1 (never use OS 9)
Never do heavy 3D Rendering or Animation (use the computer for research on the internet and writing papers, MP3, burning, photos, etc)
Now, since I am only using OS X 10.1, would the Dual 800 be like a 1.6ghz G4 in all programs, and be significantly faster all of the time?
Would the Dual 800 last much longer in terms of being outdated?
So, is the Dual 800 worth the price increase when you are only using OS X, and this computer is not solely for graphics rendering etc??
Thanks for the help...it is greatly appreciated.
I posted something earlier, but I forgot to clarify the only using OS X 10.1 part, which is extremely important.
David