I'm not really happy about that, but it does help.
I realize SL represents a big leap in Mac tech, but that fact isn't commensurate with the diminutive way Apple released it. Shouldn't they have made a clean break with OS X at that point and said, "Okay, everything's changing with Intel. Let's move on to OS Xl, or whatever"?
I don't remember OS 9.2 playing poor sport with 9.0 -- or even 8.6 for that matter.
Considering the incompatibility problems I've had so far with SL and its knack for playing mean, I'm actually more inclined to downgrade the Intel machine to Leopard than to upgrade my faithful Tiger box. So far, the headaches have outweighed the modest speed I've gained running 64-bit.
I realize SL represents a big leap in Mac tech, but that fact isn't commensurate with the diminutive way Apple released it. Shouldn't they have made a clean break with OS X at that point and said, "Okay, everything's changing with Intel. Let's move on to OS Xl, or whatever"?
I don't remember OS 9.2 playing poor sport with 9.0 -- or even 8.6 for that matter.
Considering the incompatibility problems I've had so far with SL and its knack for playing mean, I'm actually more inclined to downgrade the Intel machine to Leopard than to upgrade my faithful Tiger box. So far, the headaches have outweighed the modest speed I've gained running 64-bit.