I just read that....
this seems to be non-sensical BS.... you will wither have a roman numeral ( X = 10) or an arabic number (i.e. 10) ... you CANNOT have both.... Why not throw the greek numeral for 10 ( Kappa ) in there since its "cool" .... I really look forward to a product called MacOS XK10 (seems like a build number LOL )
If the product is called MacOS X, shouldnt the version be 1.0 simply because it is a *new* product. A ehole different and reworked OS hence the name. If anyone tries to argue the whole name change stm "System xxx" to "macOS xxx" the underlying code was the same for those 2.
Personally I think go with MacOS X 1.0, period. It sounds better. ;-)
Perhaps you are right....
Its a nice play on the inteligence of the end user (X for uniX )
IT seems a bit weird thought because apple had initially said that X = 10
so now its kinda like saying MacOS 10 10...
no sense beating a dead horse lets see how the crowds like it lol
Mac OS 8
Mac OS 9
Mac OS X 10.0 <- major change
Mac OS X 10.1
Mac OS X ...
Mac OS X 10.9
Mac OS X X 10.0 <- major change
Mac OS X X 10.1
Mac OS X X ...
Mac OS X X X 10.0 <- major change