Is they are a useless way to judge an employee.
Two of the worst techs I have ever encountered were MCSE going on three years with the certs. They knew very little theory, and instead, relied heavily on Microsoft's documentation to explain to them just what to do.
Perfect quote:
"Microsoft says that shouldn't happen. It must be a hardware failure."
Two months later, Microsoft admitted it was a bug.
Luckily, my boss, a real GURU, figured out the problem, and saved our client for a costly server upgrade. Guess what? My boss has no certs. At all.
He can do things that make your head spin off.
There's a training college here called Devry. I'm not sure if they have nationwide centers or not. As a general rule around here, no one hires Devry grads until they have 5 years experience under their belt.
Computers are more like art then something like mathematics. Formula's don't always apply. Especially for programmers. There are ussually quite a few ways to fix things, all exceptable, and every person arrives there in different ways.
Yes, there are standard ways to diagnose a problem, but it depends on how you want to diagnose. A rival firm to my own uses the unique 'clean install" method for their clients. They have the clients completely rebuild their systems every month...no matter what's wrong.
Before you ask, no, not a single client as a complaint about the stability of thier machines, nor the bills they recieve. A clean install of all applications and the system, with only mail migration, can be done with under an hour for most clients, while a hardcore troubleshoot can last upwards of six.
Does the competing firms method work? Yes, for the most part. Machines are always fresh, drives always unfragged, and everything is neatly organized.
However, isn't that kinda like buying a new car everytime you have a flat tire, only to find out there was a nail in your driveway?
This is why many Macintosh technicians are among the worst. Once they learn the easy way to fix things, they always use this method, and their knowledge base never expands. It's very similar to when Gateway tells you to re-install windows because your modem isn't dialing ( this happened to me ).
The Macintosh can be the easiest system in the world to fix. Reinstalls are simple, and correct 90% of problems. Ussually.
Nastly bugs are often documented, and you can fly by the seat of your pants with Apple's pull-aparts and walkthroughs when your dealing with hardware.
You can even get certified using these skills. Apple's cert is little more then learning how to reference the Apple Tech Info Library, and Apple Spec databases. They give you a copy to work with in the tests. Know the system well enough, and you can pass with no information at all before hand, aside from mac basics.
Again, trust me, I've seen people do it.
I haven't checked out apple's latest certs, although I plan on taking them to add another logo to my resume...in the end, that's all it does. It's resume decoration. Just like A+. MCSE, and CLP have been.
Now Cisco's certs are damn hard. DAMN hard. I failed two of them the first time through. But, when I finally passed, I knew I knew something. Why? Cisco's certs focus on theory, not obtuse knowledge. Sure, you need to know the proper commands to configure NAT and how to set up a IPSEC VPN connection, but, most of the questions asked are all theory based. Things like, "What is the best setup for x and y to do z."
With answers that vary effectively, elimating chioce elimination strategies from the fold.
Anyway, that's my two cents