I don't want to start a flamewar, but here's my opinion:
- Fighting terror doesn't work when you try to bomb them. Trouble with bombing is that you allways hurt the wrong people. I'm not saying you should never bomb, but think who you bomb.
- Helping people out of their misery helps taking away support for terror. If people see the USA is no evil empire as they were allways told by their leaders, but that the USA is a friendly bunch of people trying to help them with food, shelter, education en democracy, they will slowly learn that the USA is helping them instead of fighting them.
- Bush doesn't want Saddam Hussein for him being non-democratic. Bush supports many regimes which are far from democratic and torturing their people too (Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Pakistan).
- Bush and/or Blair say they have "evidence" that proves Hussein capable of launching biological and/or nuclear missiles now or in the near future. What the evidence involves, and how this knowledge is gathered is unknown to the public. How are we supposed to judge Bush' and Blair's decision? What if they just tell us this because they want to atack Iraq for other reasons? See next point.
- OIL. It's all about OIL. Why do you think the USA wanted to "liberate" Kuwait? Because of the poor people suffering? Because the USA wants to fight for democracy? NO WAY. It's about OIL and POWER. If the USA wants to "liberate" all people under oppression, they have to attack DOZENS of countries, like China (for occupying Tibet), Sudan, Iraq, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Syria, Pakistan, North-Korea, etcetera. But these countries have or no oil, or they cooperate with the USA right now, or there is no valid excuse to use (you cannot tell the world you want to invade Iran because they are just nasty people and you want their OIL).
- I think it is a shame that journalism in the USA (and in Europe partially too) are eating all the sh*t coming out of the White House. After 9-11 criticism is even less. Just nobody dares too question the current administration on their motives. I find that non-democratic. In a healthy democracy the people should question their administration on EVERY step they take about the motives behind the step. They should ask for concrete ANSWERS, not for the propaganda they're getting right now.
- Schroder is a left-wing politician. Since I'm a left-wing person myself, if I would live in Germany, I probably would have voted for him (or the Green Party of Joska Fischer). I can imagine not everybody in Germany being happy with him, because he didn't solve the unemployment problem. But on the other side, can anyone in the current economical situation??? And I just think that this Stoiber (or how do you spell it
) is too much right-wing, and I just don't like that
.
P.S. NO FLAME intended. So please react on this with arguments, not with flame
P.P.S. Above doesn't mean I do not support the USA in their fight against terror. I just think they're doing the wrong thing to fight it.