Quark finally goes native!

man, it's a pity they were about a year too late. i've already made the move to indesign. i may move back to quark, tho, if i can catch a demo of their X product some time. i wonder if there are any other changes to the software.
 
Considering my company just bought about 9 upgrades to Quark 5, it really sucks that Quark will probably charge us full upgrade pricing again for Quark 6. I mean what are they really adding to it besides OS X compatibility? Nothing that I've heard of so far... Screwed by Quark yet again.
 
It's too danged late for Quark... Quark is dead as far as we're concerned!

We've already upgraded/are upgrading to InDesign. PCs too - because we need all our software to be cross-platform...

Too little too late!

Goodbye Quark! :p

*Eyes Epson - Better fix the printer drivers or you're next! (borderless printing & roll paper under OSX)*
 
There's 1% chance Quark releases something better than InDesign 2 next year…

I'm ready to bet… on the 99 other ones :D
InDesign, folks ! A new standard so that the DTP industry can breathe a bit.
 
Originally posted by toast
There's 1% chance Quark releases something better than InDesign 2 next year…

I'm ready to bet… on the 99 other ones :D
InDesign, folks ! A new standard so that the DTP industry can breathe a bit.

In a way then I suppose it's actually a good thing its taken Quark so long to get on the ball.
 
It's gonna be a pay-for upgrade.
Quark 5 hadn't many new features.

Those two facts make me think that Quark is REALLY gonna comme with something new this time. They had the time to think of it, they have a new platform, they have the DEMAND for something new.

But, if I'm wrong, if Quark 6 is just a carbonized 5, then everyone is going to throw Quark out of the Dock.

An interesting thread in a specialized forum (yes, that's the same Toast :D):

http://www.desktoppublishing.com/bo...3&Forum_Title=General+QuarkXPress+Discussions
 
I switched to InDesign the moment it came out. I was sick of Quark's inability to export PDFs and, often times, the postscript files would Distill improperly. Plus, I could not stand having to constantly resave a flattened version of my Photoshop files for each little change due to Quark's lack of native Photoshop file support. Granted, I understand there are plugins for such things, but by the time you buy all the plugins, you've dropped a ton of cash just to catch up to InDesign's standard feature set.

And now, with ID's transparency support, holy crap, does that save time. I can't remember the last time I made a clipping path.

Unfortunately, there are still bugs. These bugs also apply to Quark AFAIK. Postscript and PDFs are still not what they should be. I can make files in ID that simply can't be distilled properly. I can make files with line strokes that when exported as postscript rasterize as really thick in Photoshop. I can distill files and open them in AI with all kinds of stuff wrong. I can prep files that appear fully correct in everything I open them in, but don't print or RIP. It's all over the place. You'd think the inventors of Postscript and PDF would be able to deply their own technology.
 
Back
Top