You guys do know that isn't a Holden/GM right?
As for "American Cars". That car was designed and built in australia, and the engine (5-litre Windsor) was stripped down, bored out to 5.6 Litres, and rebuilt by hand, by individually, in australia by Tickford engineers.
As for the beloved Monaro/ GTO, it is nothing but a commodore with two doors missing.
(I understand) Ford has a reputation in the US for crappy cars. Over here, the people who specifically say they're crap will say (and i quote):
"Fords are crap!"
"Why, what's so crap?"
"They're just crap man. It's a ford"
Rinse and repeat.
While there are some "ford people" like that, holdens actually are crappier. Interiors are just stuck in their, with no tought given to design, the handling and feel of even a brand new commodore (the only car they actually build here) is shoddy as best. They claim their "new" Gen ||| is really hi-tech, but it's just an old chevy 350CI, but made from alloy, not iron. ooh wow. even their V6 is extremely low-tech.
It seems quite easy to me, to compare holden to microsoft/intel.
they both make an extremely "popular" product, that is in fact quite crappy. The rest of the world can see how crappy it is, but no one will tell Joe Blow his beloved (Car/PC) is crappy.
They both flog off old(and/or someone elses) technology as "brand new", and use liters/ci/mhz to get any sort of performance, not technology. (the new ford v8 suffers from this a bit, too, but it's DOHC at least, and could go to Quad-Cam without problems i'd imagine..)
Hope i didn't upset anyone