Search results

Probably means "office politics" as in "the director of marketing wants the logo to be bigger so we have to either reprint all the boxes or convince him it's a bad idea"

Check on eBay... that's where I got mine. I think I paid 40 for an original one and 60 for a 2100. If you want the original, I'd be willing to sell it, but no, not the 2100. :-)

Could always just do 2 23 inchers side by side in a dual setup... angle them slightly so they wrap a little.

dlloyd, I guess you've never tried to work like that. Mirroring is one thing... it doesn't matter, then... in fact, it woudl be decidedly odd mirroring two side-by-side monitors, mirroring is intended for other things... but when you're in dual head mode and trying to do development work...

Ugh. We'd rather hoped to avoid that. That would be incredibly clunky, it's hard to work on two monitors that don't match, and no matter what we did, they wouldn't. That would also require leaving the powerbook open, which we'd also rather avoid... just want to slip it into a holder, plug in...

Try surfing anything on the Keenspot network with Safari. It'll crash within 3 pages.

My ibook works fine with my linksys WAP-11. The only problem I've had has been using security and passwords and the like and that's more an issue of not taking the time to figure it out.

For the best performance, get one with 8 megs of cache. I got an 80 gig 7200 rpm with 8 megs of cache from Googlegear.com for a bit less than 100 with shipping, only 3 dollars more than the same size and speed drive, from the same manufacturer, with only 2 megs of cache at Sam's Club... and the...

We're thinking of getting a new powerbook here at the office to replace one of the NT workstations, and to use for presentations (keynote = big selling point to management)... but I can't find anything about whether it can support dual monitors or not. Basically we want to have it docked...

Why on earth should it be free? You have to pay for powerpoint. There should be a free VIEWER, of course, to encourage people to use it.

why not? register me

slightly off-topic... isn't the next version of palmOS supposed to be based on BeOS? I could have sworn I read that on their site somewhere....

trademark != copyright by the rule you're noting, a journalist couldn't take a photo at an apple convention, or for that matter, any business event if he took a photo of his mac, he could sell that. If he took an image of a mac off of Apple's website, he couldn't, because that would violate...

If you take it yourself, it IS legal, and YOUR photograph would be protected under copyright law. http://www.copyright.gov/faq.html#q58 The only thing you can't photograph and use would be another photograph someone else took, as that would be no different than photocopying a novel. It's...

1988 - NeXT Cube http://www.fortunecity.com/marina/reach/435/nextcube.htm 1998 - Cobalt Qube http://news.com.com/2100-1040-243827.html?tag=rn (couldn't find any links with reviews of the original, just the 2 and 3 versions) 2000 - Apple G4 Cube http://www.apple-history.com/g4cube.html

It isn't even necessarily Apple that owns it. You can register a domain under someone else's name very easily, and point it at nameservers very easily... and apple's nameservers could be configured to point anything aimed at them to apple.com unless otherwise specified. I can't say for sure...

http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1106-957487.html Law's been overturned. That didn't take long.

Anyone read this CNN article? http://www.cnn.com/2002/TECH/ptech/09/10/apple.software.reut/index.html Headline: "Apple launches new software" text regarding new software. 1 sentence paragraph, 4th from bottom, in an article 20 or so paragraphs long.

but of course. If they were legal he probably would have answered. And been charging alot more.

Does the software come with valid, legal licenses, or is it pirated?