Yes, someday soon we will c clearly.
Bluetooth for mice is WAY better than a non-standards based option. As long as bluetooth has enough bandwidth, that is.
I bought and tried the Kensington Studiomouse Wireless for about 2 months. Then I sold it on eBay and got a Logitech MX700. I thought the Kensington's tracking was horrible.
I also tried a Targus Wireless Optical Mini Mouse. It was OK (tracking wasn't better but it was very small) but it wasn't any more convenient for using with a laptop than one of those wired mice with retractable cords because you had to carry the USB dongle around and plug it in every time you wanted to use the mouse.
The MX700 is incredible, but I don't know if bluetooth has the bandwidth for it.
A bluetooth Kensington would be better than a non-bluetooth Kensington because:
1. No USB cord to plug in from the docking station, just a power cord.
2. If you don't use the docking station idea (as most wireless mice don't) then there is nothing to plug in at all. The mouse just works. Very simple, very Apple-like.
3. No dongle or bulky docking station to carry around for laptop users. Just put the mouse in the cradle overnight at home (or just change the batteries) every few weeks when the battery gets low.
4. More choice and better prices for consumers: it will be much, much easier for any company to get in the wireless mouse market if they don't have to develop and work with a proprietary wireless system, like they would have to without bluetooth. Not only will this mean more and cheaper wireless mice, it will mean more and cheaper alternative input devices. Cool!
Well, that's enough reason for me!
