Has anyone else tried Jaguar (6c115) on an unsupported machine? I had 10.1.5 running beautifully on an 8600/200, 496 meg ram, via XPostFacto.
Then I upgraded to Jaguar. SLOW, slow slow...
So I blew the drive away (reformat) and did a clean install of Jaguar. Again, SLOW, slow, slow, much slower than 10.1.5 in every respect.
Just wondering if anyone else has encountered this. I realize "yes, I am installing it on an UNSUPPORTED machine," but I figured since 10.1.5 went so well that this Jaguar might run just as well.
TIA
Then I upgraded to Jaguar. SLOW, slow slow...
So I blew the drive away (reformat) and did a clean install of Jaguar. Again, SLOW, slow, slow, much slower than 10.1.5 in every respect.
Just wondering if anyone else has encountered this. I realize "yes, I am installing it on an UNSUPPORTED machine," but I figured since 10.1.5 went so well that this Jaguar might run just as well.
TIA