Originally posted by azosx
I can understand though how people who may have purchased 10.0, 10.1 and now 10.2 in the span of less that 2 years might feel a little burned. If they payed full price, that's near $400 for esentially 1 OS and two upgrades.
Yet another bunch of FUD. Are you Mr. Orlowski from The Register? Because your trolling sounds awfully familiar.
Let me show you something called "addition" and "subtraction":
Let's look at two people, one who has used Mac OS X since the public beta, and one who has used Mac OS X since Mac OS X 10.0:
Person 1: Using OS X since public beta:
Mac OS X public beta.... cost: $30
Mac OS X 10.0........... cost: $129 - $30 (coupon from public beta)
Mac OS X 10.1........... cost: Free upgrade.
Mac OS X 10.2........... cost: $129
Let's add that all up. $30 + ($129 - $30) + $129. You have a calculator on your Powerbook G4, no? $30 and -$30 cancel out. So you have $129 + $129. That makes.. what? $258.
Person 2: Using OS X since Mac OS X 10.0:
Mac OS X 10.0........... cost: $129
Mac OS X 10.1........... cost: Free upgrade.
Mac OS X 10.2........... cost: $129
So in this case we still have $129 + $129, or $258.
You say $258 is nearly $400. Well, let's do something called "subtraction", now. $400 - $258 is $142. That's quite a bit of error. I think that's a little far-fetched to call $258 "near $400".
Are you vastly overestimating in order to troll some more, or did you fail elementary school math?