lurk said:(Mitä? = Huh? , it made sence like 4 years ago, I guess I should update it sometime.)
bbloke said:professional
CaptainQuarkSo what does Mitä mean? And why can't it be long and interestingly Finnish like Uusiparvalniemi, the Finnish Curling Skip?
Unfortunately, I don't derive any such enjoyment from hearing the British commentators do the same. I think it shows a remarkable lack of respect for anyone of any other nation, that they couldn't be bothered to track down a Finnish (for example) TV commentator in the Press Centre and ask what "those dotty things" over the "a" mean!lurk said:I love listening to the American announcers butcher the finnish names at the olympics. The get them wrong is such creative ways that I would never guess.
lurk said:Interesting finnish names like "Häämäläinen" became the impossible "Haeaemaelaeinen".
I could get fussy but no matter how hard they try they will mess it up. One of my linguist friends explained it to me once that Finnish and English are almost as opposite as languages can be with regard to what aspects of the sound you make are important. So an English/American monoglot is just doomed because they cannot even hear the difference between what they say and what the need to say.CaptainQuark said:Unfortunately, I don't derive any such enjoyment from hearing the British commentators do the same. I think it shows a remarkable lack of respect for anyone of any other nation, that they couldn't be bothered to track down a Finnish (for example) TV commentator in the Press Centre and ask what "those dotty things" over the "a" mean!
CaptainQuark said:And wouldn't you just love to see Finland and Sweden slogging it out for the Ice Hockey Gold!? Heja Tre Kronor!!
Not really. During the war in Rhodesia there was a public information leaflet called Anatomy of a Terror, which contained some very nasty pictures of the things that the "brave freedom fighters" were doing to their own people cutting off body parts and forcing wives and families to cook and eat them, beatings, torture, mutilation and murder.bbloke said:
Understood, but it was the connection, at face value, between "anatomy" and "terror" that amused me! The mind boggled! I wondered: "Was there a particularly nasty anatomy or part of the anatomy you remembered seeing?"CaptainQuark said:Not really. During the war in Rhodesia there was a public information leaflet called Anatomy of a Terror, which contained some very nasty pictures of the things that the "brave freedom fighters" were doing to their own people cutting off body parts and forcing wives and families to cook and eat them, beatings, torture, mutilation and murder.